10 Ways Investors Can Improve The Classic Risk Parity Portfolio

The Risk Parity Portfolio ought to be the default portfolio average DIY investors utilize as a long-term investing strategy as opposed to the industry standard 60/40 portfolio.

That’s a bit of a bold statement to start off an article!

Well, if investors are concerned about primarily preparing a portfolio for all four economic regimes, controlling volatility and managing sequence of return risk, it’s a slam dunk no-brainer to select the Risk Parity Portfolio over the 60/40 Portfolio.

Yet, an even bolder question would be, can the classic long-only Risk Parity Portfolio be potentially enhanced or improved?

That’s the very question we’re going to explore in detail today.

Stones rock stack representing a risk parity portfolio
Source: Pixabay

How To Improve The Classic Risk Parity Portfolio: 10 Suggestions For Investors

How To Improve The Classic Risk Parity Portfolio: 10 Suggestions For Investors - Digital Art

Hey guys! Here is the part where I mention I’m a travel vlogger! This investing opinion blog post is entirely for entertainment purposes only. There could be considerable errors in the data I gathered. This is not financial advice. Do your own due diligence and research. Consult with a financial advisor. 

10 Ways Investors Can Improve The Classic Risk Parity Portfolio - Digital Art

Risk Parity Portfolio Introduction

Risk Parity Portfolio Introduction - Digital Art

The Risk Parity Portfolio, as one might expect given its name, is primarily concerned with managing risk and volatility.

Instead of asset classes being weighted by default configurations such as 80/20, 60/40 and 40/60, a risk parity portfolio focuses on the volatility of each asset class as opposed to its expected returns.

Furthermore, instead of being merely a concoction of just stocks and bonds, an alternative sleeve is a big part of the risk parity strategy.

Traditionally, that alternative sleeve has been gold and/or commodities.

Given that stocks, gold and commodities are considerably more volatile (in terms of standard deviation) than bonds, the typical long-only Risk Parity Portfolio typically features two different bond asset classes at 30% slices whereas stocks and gold receive 20% allocations respectively.

20% Stocks
30% Bonds A (10 Year Treasury)
30% Bonds B (Intermediate)
20% Gold/Commodities

Why this configuration?

Let’s explore the asset classes individually.

Risk Parity Portfolio Asset Classes - Digital Art

Risk Parity Portfolio Asset Classes

Risk Parity Portfolio Asset Classes Risk Levels Standard Deviation
Source: PortfolioVisualizer.com

Thanks to Portfolio Visualizer (an invaluable resource for investors), we can backtest the standard deviation of the US Total Stock Market, Intermediate Term Treasury, 10 Year Treasury and Gold dating all the way back to 1972.

We’re able to notice the following:

Risk Parity Portfolio Risk By Individual Asset Class - Digital Art

Risk Parity Portfolio Risk By Individual Asset Class

US Stock Market = 15.65% Risk (Standard Deviation) 
Gold = 19.86 Risk (Standard Deviation)
Intermediate Term Treasury = 5.75% Risk (Standard Deviation)
10 Year Treasury = 8.01% Risk (Standard Deviation) 

Since the Risk Parity Portfolio is not primarily concerned with returns (and instead focuses on risk) you end up with a portfolio that has a greater allocation to bonds than it does to stocks and gold.

Furthermore, the Risk Parity Portfolio seeks to include exposure to asset classes that are uncorrelated with each other in order to improve the overall diversification of the portfolio.

It includes an alternative sleeve (in this example Gold) as opposed to just being merely stocks and bonds.

Risk Parity Portfolio Asset Class Monthly Correlations

Monthly correlations of the Risk Parity Portfolio between the US Stock Market, Intermediate Term Treasury, 10 Year Treasury and Gold
Source: PortfolioVisualizer.com

What’s immediately obvious is that Gold and Stocks are uncorrelated with all other asset classes and it is only bonds that are highly correlated with each other but uncorrelated to both Stocks and Gold.

This level of diversification between asset classes has historically served investors extremely well offering returns (CAGR of 8.31%) that were higher than Risk (Standard Deviation of 6.99%).

Risk Parity Portfolio Returns 1972-2022

Risk Parity Portfolio Returns since 1972 to 2022
Source: PortfolioVisualizer.com

The silky smooth ride of the static Risk Parity Portfolio has offered investors close to equity-like returns with bond-like stability.

When you consider its worst year performance is only single digits (-9.93%) it’s been a bastion of stability in comparison to equity only portfolios where the US Total stock market has witnessed years as bad as -37% in 2008.

Moreover, the greatest feather in the Risk Parity Portfolios cap is its historical sequence of returns risk profile (also known as Roll Period) of only being underwater for 1 year.

Risk Parity Portfolio Roll Period 1972 to 2022

Risk Parity Portfolio Roll Period from 1972 to 2022
Source: PortfolioVisualizer.com

In comparison the US Total Stock Market has been underwater for a period of an entire decade!

How about the 60/40 Portfolio?

A five year negative sequence of returns risk.

Thus, how on earth could the Risk Parity Portfolio be improved?

Is that even possible?

Let’s explore.

US Stocks Only --> Global Equities = Risk Parity Upgrade - Digital Art

These asset allocation ideas and model portfolios presented herein are purely for entertainment purposes only. This is NOT investment advice. These models are hypothetical and are intended to provide general information about potential ways to organize a portfolio based on theoretical scenarios and assumptions. They do not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation/goals, risk tolerance and/or specific needs of any particular individual. 

1) US Stocks Only –> Global Equities = Risk Parity Upgrade

Let’s grab the lowest hanging fruit of all and move from US stocks only to a globally diversified equity allocation.

Afterall, diversification is your only free lunch in investing and avoiding “home country bias” is a paramount upgrade.

Indeed, US equities have served investors well over the past 40 years but the cautionary tale of Japan is a reminder to diversify whenever possible.

Furthermore, consider the 2000s as an example of what can potentially happen when you put all of your equity eggs in one basket.

US Stock Market, International Developed Market and Emerging Markets in the 2000s
Source: PortfolioVisualizer.com

A globally diversified equity allocation prevents investors from having a lost decade.

US Total Stock Market returns stymied portfolios with a -0.27% CAGR whereas International Developed Equities were slightly above water with a 1.24% return and the one that saved your bacon was Emerging Markets coming in at 9.82% CAGR.

Thus, to improve our naive Risk Parity Portfolio we’ll go from something like a $VTI US Total Stock Market to a $VT Total World Stock Market.

Market Cap Weighted Global Equities upgraded to Global Minimum Volatility Equities - Digital Art

2) Market Cap Weighted Global Equities –> Global Minimum Volatility Equities

Imagine being able to enjoy the same return profile (or better) of a globally diversified equity portfolio while subtracting 400 to 500 basis points of risk to further smooth out the ride?

Too good to be true?

Enter the room Global Minimum Volatility Equities.

Minimum volatility investing is an equity factor strategy that seeks to “control volatility” by screening for companies that have more stable returns while sifting out companies that are more volatile.

You eliminate lottery ticket stocks.

It’s as much about what is included (more stable stocks) as it is about what is excluded (highly volatile stocks).

You would think that trying to reduce volatility would lower returns but that is not the case at all.

Global Minimum Volatility MSCI Performance
Source: msci.com

In fact, when you compare MSCI minimum volatility indexes (US, EAFE, EM, Canada, etc) what you more often find is that they historically outperform their market-cap weighted benchmark.

Since 1988 the MSCI World Minimum Volatility Index has outperformed its parent index with returns of 8.43% and 7.64% respectively.

Hence, you get a “free lunch” of potentially greater returns but more importantly you significantly upgrade the standard deviation of an asset class that is one of the portfolios most volatile wings (only gold being more volatile).

World Minimum Volatility Performance and Risk from MSCI
Source: msci.com

Intermediate Treasury upgraded to Long Term Treasury as a RP Enhancement to the portfolio - digital art

3) Intermediate Treasury –> Long Term Treasury = RP Enhancement

The next upgrade we’ll be seeking is in the fixed income category of bonds.

Intermediate Treasury see ya later alligator!

Enter the room Long Term Treasury.

Wait. But. Why?

Let’s consider the period of 2000 until the end of 2008 – the roughest stretch for markets since 1972.

During the Bear Market Years of 2000 until the end of 2002 and 2008, Long-Term Treasury provided significantly more protection versus Intermediate Treasury.

Moreover, for that entire rough period of time it outperformed Intermediate Treasury by over 200 basis points.

For a so called “lost decade” for equities, finding assets that provide more stability (when you need it most) and offer higher returns is an upgrade worth taking in my books.

Long Term Treasury vs Intermediate Term Treasury 2000 until end of 2008

10 Year Treasury replaced with TIPS (Treasury Inflation Protected Securities) - Digital Art

4) 10 Year Treasury –> TIPS (Treasury Inflation Protected Securities)

One of the biggest problems of owning Intermediate Treasury and 10 Year Treasury is just how highly correlated they are to each other.

Intermediate Treasury and 10 Year Treasury Correlation
Source: PortfolioVisualizer.com

With a correlation of 0.96 dare I say they’re almost the same!

Given we’ve got two slots for fixed income diversification in our Risk Parity Portfolio let’s try to upgrade by finding a solution that is less correlated and strategically different.

Drum roll….


U.S. government issued Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) are a special type of Treasury security indexed to inflation.

By adding this asset class to our portfolio we’re making it more regime ready for when inflation rears its ugly head.

Enter the room 2022.


Normally that expression is referred to on this site for funds and/or asset classes but 2022 has been a unique animal in and of itself.

For those of us too young to have experienced rampant inflation in previous years it’s a big part of our lives now.

Maybe the most important upgrade of all is that now we’ve got two fixed income asset classes that have a correlation of 0.63 to each other as opposed to 0.96.

We’ll take it and move on.

Leverage to let's Lever the Portfolio Up Buttercup = 200% Canvas - Digital Art

5) Leverage –> Lever the Portfolio Up Buttercup = 200% Canvas

Here is where I’m going to lose some of you.

We’re going to add leverage to the portfolio to expand the canvas to 200%.

Not to add more heaping scoops of what we’ve already got but to instead add multiple different asset classes and strategies to improve the overall portfolio diversification and return stack performance on top of the base we’ve already created.

But won’t that make the Risk Parity Portfolio fall apart?

That was a question I once had.

I created the Battle of the Leveraged Portfolios to test the Risk Parity Portfolio along with other classic portfolios to see if, when, why, how it would fall apart.

You can see the results here: 2X, 3X, 4X

The TL;DR version is this:

The Risk Parity Portfolio can handle leverage like a pack-mule.

In every round of the competition its returns exceeded its level of risk, roll periods remained the same and its Sharpe Ratio and Sortino Ratio improved.

But all of that was done with just four crude assets: long US total stocks, treasuries (Intermediate and Long) and gold.

What we’re attempting to do is not increase what we’ve already got but instead add additional layers of diversification to further increase the efficiency of the portfolio.

Sound exciting?

It does for me!

Macro shot of a Chameleon representing trend-following investing
Source: Pixabay

6) Trend-Following Managed Futures Strategy

It’s time to bring the Chameleon into the room!

So far we’ve had nothing but long-only non-adaptive asset classes and strategies in our portfolio.

That changes right now.

For those unfamiliar, trend-following is the predominant managed futures strategy used to go both long and short global equity, bond, commodity and currency indexes.

Historically speaking, it has provided equity-like returns with only half of the volatility.

Moreover, it is uncorrelated to both long only equity and bond markets.

Furthermore, it typically does extremely well during periods of market turmoil when trends are strong.

Hence, it has been referred to as a crisis alpha-strategy – even though it provides decent return streams outside of bear market situations.

Thus, the strategy utilizes short, medium and long term signals to determine whether to go long, short or take no position at all.

Quite honestly I couldn’t imagine my portfolio now without it.

Best of all it has done extremely well in 2022 when basically everything else under the sun has been getting disemboweled.

Managed Futures vs 60/40 Portfolio returns in 2022
Source: PortfolioVisualizer.com

Check out the difference between Managed Futures trend-following ticker $DBMF versus milquetoast 60/40 $AOM.

Suffering Succotash!!!

Global Systematic Macro + Options Strategies (Aside from Trend) - Digital Art

7) Global Systematic Macro + Options Strategies (Aside from Trend)

Some of the top quants on #FinTwit have coined the popular saying: “Diversify your diversifiers, yo!”

And that’s the plan over here.

Instead of relying “only” on trend-following strategies we’ll deploy other global systematic macro strategies such as carry, value, momentum, quality, seasonality and mean reversion along with long-volatility options strategies to protect against tail-risk (extreme market events).

I won’t go over each of these line-items one by one but instead we’ll define a few for good measure.

Carry is a strategy where investors seek to benefit from a wide differential between high and low carry assets.

Long-volatility strategies typically involve buying out of the money put-options, at various strike prices, to provide a type of “portfolio insurance” should the markets experience a fierce drawdown.

By not just sticking to trend-following we’re exposing our portfolio to more diversified diversifiers.

REITS (Real Estate Investment Trust) Upgraded In A Risk Parity Portfolio - Digital Art

8) REITS (Real Estate Investment Trust)

Let’s add some global REITS to our portfolio.

Real Estate Investment Trust is a specialized equity asset class that gives you exposure to many types of commercial real estate.

The primary reason for adding them in your portfolio is to diversify your equity sleeve and hedge against inflation.

Much like with our bonds, we’re seeking to add diversification to our equities sleeve by offering something less correlated to the US total stock market.

Given that the US Total Stock Market and REITS have a 0.61 correlation we’ll happily take it.

Let’s wind back the clock to the 2000s for a bit of a case study.

US Total Stock Market vs REITS during the 2000s
Source: PortfolioVisualizer.com

When the US Total Stock Market was causing investors to pull their collective hair out, REITs were the all-star performer that saved the day.

I’m not sure if we’ll witness such an extreme situation again in the future but it’s nice to be prepared with something in the portfolio that’ll potentially work in our favour.

Market Neutral Equities Strategy As A Risk Parity Portfolio Upgrade - Digital Art

9) Market Neutral Equities Strategy

Market-Neutral Equities is an absolute return hedge fund strategy that seeks positive returns in any market environment.

By choosing a low NET exposure (typically between 0 to 20%) it is just as long as it is short most of the time.

Furthermore, it is lowly correlated to markets providing the diversification benefit we’re craving with our additional 100% canvas space.

Let’s use an example to showcase how it can make money even in the down market.

Let’s say the strategy is long 100 and short 90 for a net 10 exposure.

Our long equity component is down -8% whereas our short component is down -20%.

We’d be -80 + 180 for a net of 100.

In this scenario we’d earn an impressive 10% return before fees.

It can also generate positive returns when the market is up.

Our long component at 100 is up 12% whereas our short is only up 5%

We’re 120 – 45 in this scenario for an overall 7.5% return.

Given the absolute return potential and diversification benefit of the strategy we’re excited to add it.

Mish-Mash of Other Alternative Strategies - Digital Art

10) Mish-Mash of Other Alternative Strategies

To close things off we’ll further diversify our portfolio by drawing from a well of a mish-mash of other alternative strategies.

These could potentially be but are not limited to the following:

    1. Merger Arbitrage
    2. Bitcoin
    3. Reinsurance
    4. Tail Risk
    5. Credit Hedging
    6. Private Equity
    7. Private Loans

I could write an entire article on each of these strategies so we’ll keep this brief.

The idea is just to add a few more diversifiers to round off the portfolio.

It would entirely be up to you which of these you’d potentially choose depending on your interest towards the various asset classes and/or strategies.

Harmony rock stacked on each other
Source: Pixabay

Improved Risk Parity Portfolio

What does our improved Risk Parity Portfolio look like after all of these potential upgrades and an expanded canvas?

Maybe something like this:

Improved Enhanced Risk Parity Portfolio 200% - Digital Art

Enhanced Risk Parity Portfolio 200%

40% Trend-Following (Equity, Bond, Currency, Commodity Indexes)
30% Global Systematic Managed Futures Strategies (Carry, Seasonality, Value, Momentum, Quality, Mean Reversion, etc)
30% Long Treasury
30% TIPS
20% Global Minimum Volatility Equities
20% Gold
10% Market Neutral Equities
10% Diversified Alternatives Basket (Reinsurance, Merger Arbitrage, Bitcoin, Private Equity/Credit, etc)

Overall, I very much like the looks of what we’ve got over here.

We’ve improved the overall diversification of our portfolio while adding more uncorrelated asset classes/strategies to the mix.

I’d expect returns to exceed risk with this high Sharpe/Sortino ratio seeking portfolio with the potential to outperform most others while offering a considerably smoother ride.

Lego representing ETFs and Mutual funds as building blocks
Source: Pixabay

ETFs and Mutual Funds to Create an Enhanced Risk Parity Portfolio

For those interested in putting together something “similar” to what we’ve suggested we could potentially utilize the following funds:

US Investors

40% UPAR

UPAR Ultra Risk Parity sets the table for the long-only Risk Parity asset allocation by providing global equities (US, Int-Dev, EM) at 35%, TIPS (49%), Long Term Treasury (49%) and Gold/Commodities (35%) for a net exposure of 168%.

RDMIX Rational Resolve Adaptive Asset Allocation from ReSolve Asset Management provides the backbone of the “adaptive” risk-parity mandate with trend-following and an ensemble of global systematic managed futures strategies (carry, seasonality, mean reversion, value, etc) across all global equity, bonds, commodities and currency indexes.

QRPIX Alternative Risk Premia Fund from AQR goes long/short across equity, bond, currency and commodity indexes while deploying five unique styles including Value, Momentum, Carry, Defensive, and Trend.

SRRIX Stone Ridge Reinsurance Risk Premium Interval Fund offers investors the alternative strategy of reinsurance to round out the portfolio.

The hybrid approach of long-only and long-short risk parity strategies as the backbone of this portfolio along with diversified diversifiers should provide investors the returns meets risk management they crave.

Canadian Investors

40% UPAR

UPAR Ultra Risk Parity sets the table for the long-only Risk Parity asset allocation by providing global equities (US, Int-Dev, EM) at 35%, TIPS (49%), Long Term Treasury (49%) and Gold/Commodities (35%) for a net exposure of 168%.

HRAA.TO Horizons Adaptive Asset Allocation from ReSolve Asset Management provides the backbone of the “adaptive” risk-parity mandate with trend-following and an ensemble of global systematic managed futures strategies (carry, seasonality, mean reversion, value, etc) across all global equity, bonds, commodities and currency indexes.

PFAA.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Alpha Alternative Fund offers investors a primary strategy of market neutral, special situation credit and merger arbitrage with a secondary component of Momentum, Value, Quality, Discretionary Hedges and Tail Risk.

ONEC.TO Accelerate OneChoice Alternative ETF is a 10 in 1 fund offering exposure to Bitcoin, Long-Short Equity, Senior Loans, Merger Arbitrage, REITS and Global Infrastructure equities not already included in the portfolio.

The one sad thing here is that we’re not able to squeeze a minimum volatility equities strategy into the equation but hopefully such a product will exist someday in the future!

The Picture Perfect Portfolio that I’d love to launch someday as an ETF attempts to solve that.

Risk Parity Resources For Further Reference - Digital Art

Risk Parity Resources For Further Reference

For those interested in learning more about Risk Parity investing I’d recommend the following resources:

    1. Risk Parity: How to Invest for All Market Environments (book) by Alex Shahidi
    2. Adaptive Asset Allocation (book) by Adam Butler, Rodrigo Gordillo and Mike Philbrick
    3. Risk Parity Chronicles (blog) from Justin living in Japan
    4. All Seasons Portfolio (blog) by Nicholas Ahonen from Sweden
Nomadic Samuel filming a travel video while visiting Lake Titicaca in Peru
Nomadic Samuel filming a travel video while visiting Lake Titicaca in Peru

Nomadic Samuel Final Thoughts

Sorry, my friends for yet another behemoth of a post!

I hit you last time with 4000 words and now we’re well over 3000 here.

To say I’m a fan of Risk Parity would be an understatement.

I feel it should be the “default” portfolio for investors of all shapes, sizes and (of course) stages of life.

With a return profile greater than its risk and a roll period that puts the 60/40 to shame, we ought to collectively be pondering what’s going on here?

Risk Parity is the literal backbone of my own DIY quant portfolio.

The static long-only Risk Parity Portfolio has had impressive results for over 50 years.

However, as I think we’ve all seen in this article it can easily be upgraded.

Strategies that were once only available to high networth individuals and institutions are now available for the little guys (us plebs).

Failing to integrate these strategies into your portfolio seems like a lost opportunity and then some.

What’s most exciting is that fund of funds ETFs and Mutual Funds are now available meaning you can cobble together a maximally diversified risk parity portfolio with as little as 4 tickers!


So much diversification in just a handful of funds.

The crazy part is that I think it’s only going to get better.

What an exciting time to be an investor.

I think we’ll leave it at that.

Ciao for now!

Important Information

Investment Disclaimer: The content provided here is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, tax or professional advice. Investments carry risks and are not guaranteed; errors in data may occur. Past performance, including backtest results, does not guarantee future outcomes. Please note that indexes are benchmarks and not directly investable. All examples are purely hypothetical. Do your own due diligence. You should conduct your own research and consult a professional advisor before making investment decisions. 

“Picture Perfect Portfolios” does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information in this post and is not responsible for any financial losses or damages incurred from relying on this information. Investing involves the risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. When it comes to capital efficiency, using leverage (or leveraged products) in investing amplifies both potential gains and losses, making it possible to lose more than your initial investment. It involves higher risk and costs, including possible margin calls and interest expenses, which can adversely affect your financial condition. The views and opinions expressed in this post are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of anyone else. You can read my complete disclaimer here

More from Nomadic Samuel
20 Different 3 Fund Expanded Canvas Portfolios With 4+ Strategies
Sometimes it’s a good idea to give yourself a creative challenge. One...
Read More
Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *