The Cockroach Portfolio | A Diversified Portfolio Ready for All Economic Regimes

The Cockroach portfolio is a four quadrant portfolio that combines the best of traditional long-only asset classes with derivatives to create a diversified masterpiece prepared for all economic regimes.

I once waged a war against cockroaches inside of my illegal housing structure (basically a shack on top of a roof) in South Korea and lost badly.

I felt defeated at the time by this relentless pest.

How could it be that such a small creature could continuously reappear, despite my best efforts to set traps, over and over again?

Those little buggers.

Well, clearly I didn’t respect my opponent enough.

Did you know that cockroaches can withstand up to 900 times their body weight?

Hard to squish.

Not easy to stomp on.

Plus their flexible exoskeleton allows them to fit into tight spaces.

If you can imagine the most apocalyptic scenario you and I may not still be here but they likely are.

So if you were to conjure up a creature you’d most want to represent a portfolio that can endure all economic regimes that is thrown its way, I’m pretty sure a cockroach would make the shortlist.

Fortunately, we’re already there.

Jason Buck, the co-founder of Mutiny Funds (along with Taylor Pearson) created the Cockroach Portfolio.

We’re thrilled to have Jason as our next guest of the “investing legends” series.

This is a portfolio that can play both offence and defence, during all four economic regimes, in a way that a typical 60/40 is woefully unprepared for.

The inspiration for the Cockroach Portfolio is a modern “best ideas” reinterpretation of the Harry Browne Permanent Portfolio.

Many, industry wide, wax nostalgic or giddy up with glee over the Risk Parity Portfolio and Ray Dalio All Weather Portfolio.

But it was the Permanent Portfolio that came first and in many ways it doesn’t get the due credit it deserves.

As always, I’m rambling on; let’s hear from Jason.

Hey guys! Here is the part where I mention I’m a travel vlogger! This “Investing Legends” interview is entirely for entertainment purposes only. There could be considerable errors in the data I gathered. This is not financial advice. Do your own due diligence and research. Consult with a financial advisor. 

Macro shot of a Cockroach
Source: Pixabay

The Cockroach Portfolio

The Cockroach Portfolio
Source: MutinyFund.com

Harry Browne Permanent Portfolio | 4 Quadrant Diversification

Thanks for joining us today Jason!

Before we take a deep-dive into the nitty gritty of the Cockroach Portfolio, I thought we could first lay the foundation for your portfolio by examining its inspiration – The Permanent Portfolio created by Harry Browne.

With its design simplicity (of four equal quadrants) and its regime readiness (by factoring in asset classes that are prepared for stagflation and deflationary bust) it is considered by many to be the first serious attempt by a portfolio to diversify in such a way that it can thrive in all economic environments.

Harry Browne Permanent Portfolio Asset Allocation
Source: PortfolioVisaulizer.com

For those not familiar, the Harry Browne Permanent Portfolio is as follows:

25% Stocks
25% Bonds
25% Gold
25% Cash

What is it about the Harry Browne Permanent Portfolio that you find most attractive?

And why do you think it doesn’t get the credit that the Ray Dalio All-Weather and Risk Parity portfolios receive today?

First, thank you for having me, I appreciate it.

Second, nothing I say is investment advice, please seek out your own investment professional.

What I find most attractive about Harry Browne’s Permanent Portfolio is that he wasn’t trying to predict the future.

He was acknowledging that he doesn’t have a crystal ball and no one else does either.

When you build a portfolio for your savings, the premise should start with I don’t know what the future holds. Browne’s four quadrant model takes into account the 4 primary return drivers in a rough global macro sense.

4 Macro Quadrants – Diversification

4 Macro Quadrants of Diversification including Growth, Decline, Deflation, Inflation
Source: MutinyFund.com

We are always dealing with the axis of growth and inflation.

We have either a growing economy or a shrinking one.

We have either inflation or deflation in the monetary base.

Obviously, these things overlap like a Venn diagram and no regime is just one of these quadrants.

The other point is a properly diversified portfolio is always going to have one or more of the asset classes in drawdown and this is painful for people to handle.

Yet, you need this diversification if you cannot predict the future.

The point of the portfolio is that it muddles along no matter what macro environment we are in.

It protects your savings and grows it over the long term even after inflation.

Most importantly the portfolio helps protect you from making any behavioral errors due to panic, greed and fear, which is what affects compounding even more than the asset class mix.

I think the simple answer of why Risk Parity is better known than Permanent Portfolio is that Ray Dalio runs one of the largest hedge funds in the world.

In our world, financial success is a proxy for genius.

I find that there is a general lack of historical awareness in the financial industry and managers tend to not give credit to the people that came before them.

Ray Dalio simply levered up the ideas from Permanent Portfolio based on the individual asset classes historical volatilities.

Ensemble Approach: Diversifies Each Quadrant

Ensemble Diversifiers in Each Quadrant of the Cockroach Portfolio
Source: MutinyFund.com

The Cockroach Portfolio: Asset Allocation

Let’s explore the Cockroach Portfolio.
For those not familiar with the portfolio it is a four quadrant pie with equal slices of stocks, income, trend and volatility components.
Moreover, these slices are specifically geared towards being regime ready for four economic outcomes including growth, decline, inflation and deflation.
Can you introduce us to what we’ve got under the hood here and why the portfolio has been split into four quadrants in terms of its composition and capabilities to handle all economic outcomes?

4 Quadrant Return Drivers

The 4 Quadrants Return Drivers of the CockRoach Portfolio
Source: MutinyFund.com
We take a modern ensemble approach to Browne’s four quadrant model because we believe in diversifying our diversifiers.
We use Global Equities, Global Bonds, Long Volatility (instead of cash), and Commodity Trend (instead of just gold).
We also hold a foundational position in what we call Fiat Hedges, positions in gold and a small position in crypto currencies in case of a cataclysmic event to all other asset classes.
We like to combine the Offense of Stock and Bonds with the Defense of Volatility, Trend, and Fiat Hedges.

Offensive Assets

Offensive factors of the Cockroach Portfolio
Source: MutinyFund.com

We believe there are essentially two ways to make returns over a Risk On economic cycle: equity and debt.

This is your Offense.

Defensive Assets

Defensive aspect of the CockRoach Portfolio
Source: MutinyFund.com

In a Risk Off environment you want to be hedging those equity and debt positions.

This is your Defense.

During periods of economic growth, stocks (equity) tends to do well.

We use a combination of Global Equity indexes because we want that broad diversification and do not want to fall victim to home country bias.

During periods of deflation or disinflation, Income (debt) from bonds, or bond like income, tend to do well.

We us a combination of Global government bonds and other active Bond/Income strategies for broad diversification.

When stock markets sell off in a Risk Off environment we have an ensemble of Long Volatility and Tail Hedges that hopefully ballast the sell off in the stock market.

When inflation starts to run and the Bond/Income bucket is likely to sustain losses, we have a Commodity Trend ensemble that can hopefully capture that inflationary move via the commodity markets.

Investment Strategy vs Branding

Branding at times seems to be an afterthought in the investment industry.
We’ve got no shortage of very literal and technical “geek speak” products and branding out there in the universe of funds/strategies.
But recently, along came the Cockroach Portfolio and also the Dragon Portfolio.
We’re starting to see more creativity in this space when it comes to branding, but also a concerted educational effort in terms of explaining more esoteric concepts to investors such as trend-following and volatility strategies.
How important do you think branding and clear communication is in terms of its impact towards creating success in this space of alternative investment ideas and strategies?
You touched on one of my pet peeves.
We are a fund of funds, so we currently manage about 20 sub-managers.
I have gotten so tired of all of them using acronyms as naming conventions.
We track hundreds of managers and each can have multiple strategies, if they have 3 letter acronyms, who is possibly going to remember what they do?
I’m sure you have read the literature on how to build memory palaces, you need to be evocative to make things stick.
Before we launched our Cockroach fund, every single person we talked to told us not to call it that and it was a terrible idea.
My retort was always, but will you remember it?
Even if you don’t like cockroaches that name represents exactly what we are trying to accomplish by managing our client’s savings through multiple economic cycles.
Clear communication is vital to getting our concepts across and my partner, Taylor Pearson, is world class at explaining complex subjects in understandable essays.
We always knew from the start by building our portfolios around complex instruments like derivatives and lesser known markets like commodity futures, that we would have to excel in educating our clients up a steep learning curve.

I also think there is an interesting cultural divide in our industry when it comes to creativity in marketing and branding.

Millennials and Gen Z skew towards transparency, authenticity, and prefer the irreverence of showing your human side.

While the older generations seem to skew towards opacity and pretending to be an infallible, robot wizard behind the curtain.


Source: The Derivative by RCM Alternatives on YouTube

Portfolio Construction: Offence and Defence

I love the offence and defence analogy of the Cockroach Portfolio, of a maximally diversified portfolio requiring both capabilities in order to win championships (or in the case for investors – keeping them invested during turbulent times while staying the course).
When one thinks of specific sports teams that win championships it is often not the team with the most star players but rather the most balanced and bulletproof roster that hoists the trophy at the end of the season.
Unfortunately, industry-wide the common belief is that stocks provide the offence and bonds cover all of your defensive needs.
We’re clearly seeing in 2022 that this isn’t the case.
What is it that most investors are not understanding/grasping in terms of preparing for defensive coverage within their portfolios?
And is there a sports team in particular, from any given season or league, that kind of best represents a balanced approach to winning a championship?

Correlations are a tricky thing.

If we look back over the past 20 years or even 40 years, stocks and bonds have been mostly negatively correlated.

So, we were able to use a 60/40 portfolio where the bonds hedged the stock position.

When we widen our historic scope to 100+ years, our research suggests to us that stocks and bonds are mildly correlated the majority of the time.

This is why we don’t believe in bonds as a defensive hedge.

We have lived through an unprecedented 40 year bull market in bonds.

I also say correlations are tricky because they depend on the time frame we use and they are in constant flux.

When a major market correction happens like March 2020, correlation go to 1 meaning almost all asset classes sell off together as everyone is trying to raise some cash in a liquidity crisis.

This is why we prefer long volatility strategies such as buying puts on the S&P 500 index, which we feel are more structurally negatively correlated as an example.

The negative correlation is built into the hedge, so we are less concerned about correlations being conditional.

Our friend Chris Cole of Artemis Capital Management wrote a great essay on Dennis Rodman of the Chicago Bulls during their multiple NBA championships run.

The essence of the essay is that Rodman’s ability to rebound and play defense raised the team’s ensemble average of putting up more points than the other team.

Even if Rodman could have scored negative points, his rebounding ability allowed Michael Jordan to take more shots, leading to a higher positive expectancy for the team.

A more modern version would be Draymond Green and the Golden State Warriors.

I played soccer most of my life, so I would prefer to use the Liverpool Football Club in the English premiership.

They were a great offensive team, but they didn’t start winning championships until they added Alisson as a goalie and Van Dijk as a sweeper (last defender).

The two of them are such outliers at preventing other teams from scoring that Liverpool can play their all out, “heavy metal” style of offense and completely overwhelm other teams.

One can use analogies from almost any sport in that we need offense and defense as well as the transitional players in between.

Source: Mutiny Fund on YouTube

Equity Allocation

Let’s start exploring each of the 25% slabs of pie we’ve got in the Cockroach Portfolio.

The easiest one to examine first would be the equity sleeve which represents the growth macro quadrant.
What immediately jumps out to me is the concerted effort to have an equal slice of US, International and Emerging markets exposure.
How important is avoiding “home country” bias and allocating to all three major markets of the world in terms of a diversification and returns standpoint?
As always we believe in broad diversification to reduce our ignorance tax.
If you invest solely in your home countries stock market you are taking a very concentrated bet, even if that is the United States.
The under/over performance of US/Developed/Emerging go through long cycles.
Typically the US is very tech centric, while Emerging economies can be very commodity centric as an example.
We are interested in acquiring exposure to the Global GDP in our allocation.
A global index is likely to perform at a lower volatility and drawdown than any of its individual country components over the long term.
You are also mitigating the blow up risk of a singular country, no matter how remote the possibility seems, there are plenty of historical precedents.
Allocating to a single country like the US equity markets can also be seen as a proxy bet on the US dollar.
Broad global diversification helps reduce these types of currency risks.

Fixed Income Allocation

One thing that sets apart both the Cockroach Portfolio and Permanent Portfolio apart from the Ray Dalio All Weather Portfolio and long-only Risk Parity Portfolio is a 25% sleeve towards fixed income to combat deflation.

The Ray Dalio and long-only Risk Parity Portfolio have close to 2 parts bonds to 1 part equities.
However, the Cockroach and the Permanent Portfolio limit this sleeve to 25%.
Is there a clear benefit towards limiting the bond sleeve to just 1/4 of the pie versus having it take up nearly half of the portfolio?
I notice once again a commitment to global diversification with a US and International Bonds blend but the most interesting sliver is an ensemble carry strategy.
Can you describe what the carry strategy is for investors who aren’t familiar with it?
These are complex, multi-part questions 🙂

The bond units in Dalio’s Risk Parity can actually fluctuate to a lot more that just 2 to 1.

Risk Parity is based on using a look back to determine the volatility of each asset and then leveraging or deleveraging to make them equally weighted to volatility.

We don’t believe volatility is a great proxy for risk, we are more concerned about drawdowns.

Our research suggests that in the 1930’s a 60/40 portfolio would have experience a -60% plus drawdown.

Risk parity may have done better or worse depending on their market timing and reduction of bond leverage, but that is hard to know for certain.

To be fair, classic risk parity uses other asset classes besides stocks and bonds.

We tend to think about the emergent properties of a portfolio in aggregate.

We start with balancing our exposures to Offense and Defense, or Short Volatility and Long Volatility.

Through this lens we believe that Stock and Bonds thrive in low volatility/short volatility environments.

Meaning they are harmed by volatility, so they are both part of our offensive portfolio.

After Offense and Defense, we then think about the four quadrant model, we use the lens of return drivers and weighting more towards long term drawdowns than to short term volatility correlations.

Then within each bucket we prefer to diversify those concentration risks further.

Using a longer term perspective, we feel the 25% allocation to bonds is more appropriate.

We tend to call our Bond allocation “Income” because the general idea is in a deflationary environment one prefers a steady income.

As I said above, we believe in broad diversification.

If one position sizes each strategy or instrument appropriately you are reducing the risk of any one element disproportionately hurting the portfolio returns.

The Carry strategy, that we allocate to Resolve Asset Management, uses the broad markets exposure available in the futures space to harness term structure carry as an income across dozens of instruments.

Put simply, if an instrument has a term structure in contango, meaning the future months are consecutively higher than the front month, one could go short and ride the term structure down.

And vice versa when the term structure is in backwardation, where the front month is higher than the consecutive months, one could go long and ride up the curve.

This is a very simplistic example and the nuance is in the details.

It is a differentiated form of an income trade offering us more diversification within that sleeve.


Source: Rocket Dollar on YouTube

Trend Following Allocation

I’ve been delaying gratification over here waiting to ask you about the trend-following 25% slice of your portfolio that is geared towards fighting inflation.

Discovering trend-following and integrating it into my portfolio has been the biggest strategic shift I’ve made recently as an investor.
It’s kind of like finding great indie music.
It’s always existed you just didn’t know about it but now you can’t imagine your life (or in this case your portfolio) without it.
Can you explain what trend-following is, for those who aren’t as familiar with the strategy, and also talk about its benefits from a diversification perspective?
As a follow up, you’ve got equal slices of short, medium and long-term trend ensemble. How does this approach improve the trend-following strategy overall?
Trend Following tends to break people’s brains because it is the opposite of what most people are taught.

We are told to buy low and sell high.

Trend Following seeks to buy high and sells higher, and sells low and buys lower.

The buy low and sell high is actually a mean reversion strategy, while Trend Following is a break out strategy.

When a market breaks out of its mean reversion channel, Trend managers will either go long or short based on the extension of the trend in either direction.

The strategy is agnostic to direction. It’s not as well know because they also implement their trades in the futures markets.

In these markets one can trade 100s of instruments across: commodities, currencies, and financials.

Trend followers are taking advantage of herd mentality in markets and for trends to persist in either direction.

A benefit is they are agnostic to market direction and happy to follow the trend either long or short.

At any given time they will be both long and short many different market instruments.

I’ve previously discussed that we start our portfolio from an Offense and Defense perspective.

Then we look at the four quadrant model of return drivers.

The third element is correlation.

We believe that there are only 3 correlations: correlated, uncorrelated, and negatively correlated.

In a liquidity shock all offensive assets go to a correlation of 1 with equities.

One can hedge with negatively correlated assets like long volatility or tail risk put options which should be more negatively correlated in a sharp sell off.

Trend Following, by its bi-directional nature, is an Uncorrelated strategy.

Even though people will talk about 16 uncorrelated return streams, we feel all assets or strategies fall within the 3 broad correlations, especially under stress.

Inflation is an incredibly pernicious problem and we can only try our best to maintain our purchase power parity through broad diversification.

We feel our best bet on capturing a return from inflation is by having a broad diversification to commodity markets via Trend Following strategies.

We search out managers that have at least a 40% exposure to commodity markets and we tranche them by look back periods of short, medium, and long.

Every Trend Follower is going to have a speed or duration to their model based on look back period to determine a trend.

There is a large dispersion of returns when it comes to these strategies.

We are not trying to pick the best manager because that changes year to year, we are trying to get broad exposure or create a beta return from the entire space.

We start with look back periods because different ones will do better at different times.

Long term managers did well in 2008’s protracted recession and short term didn’t do as well.

In March 2020, short term managers did well and long term did poorly.

Many medium term managers were whip sawed in the first half of 2020.

Meaning they were long going into the sell off and then were under positioned for the rebound, this happens often in Trend Following.

Within the look back sleeves we also diversify by trading styles (moving averages, regressions, breakouts) and monetization heuristics (vol targeted, trailing stop, tranching).

This diversification on several levels is attempting to smooth out the equity curve and create a generalized beta return from the asset class.

Blurry volatile wave
Source: Pixabay

Volatility Allocation

The last quadrant we’ve yet to cover is the Volatility sleeve which salivates over economic decline scenarios.
This quite honestly is the strategy I understand the least as a DIY investor.
I get that this is more or less portfolio insurance for when markets decline but I’m not fully up to speed with all of the strategies.
Maybe we can cover all four of them briefly in terms of defining what they do and when they’re expected to best perform.
Volatility Arbitrage.
Long Vol Options.
Short Index Futures.
Tail Risk Puts.

Volatility is the most difficult space in investing to understand.

We firmly believe that Trend and Volatility are the last bastions of active management.

Especially in Volatility, you get what you pay for.

Tail Risk Puts– this is the classic hedge.

The general idea is you buy puts on the S&P index to truncate your losses beyond a certain attachment point.

So, if you want to prevent any losses beyond a -20% drawdown in the S&P you buy the equivalent amount of puts around the -20% strike that will cover the losses 1 for 1 beyond that point.

You are willing to take a -20% loss, but no further loss beyond that point.

This sounds easy, but is super tricky in which strikes you buy, how much you spend on premium, and when do you roll them or monetize them.

Long Vol Options– this is a way to lessen the bleed of constantly paying the premium of rolling tail risk puts.

Managers opportunistically buy puts or calls based on their internal metrics and algorithms for when they think a “forest fire may spark into a contagion”.

They are trying to time the market for an expansion in volatility.

Volatility Arbitrage– also known as volatility relative value, is a form of pairs trade.

They are trading S&P versus VIX or trading within the term structure of VIX futures.

The idea is to combine negatively correlated assets in the right ratios so you can garner an income from this market neutral pair.

Another way to look at is, they are isolating the term structure roll of VIX futures to have a market neutral way of earning the roll yield.

Short Index Futures– this is a form of intra-day trend following on the market indexes around the world.

As an individual stock market sells off they will follow that move down during market hours, but can do similar trades around the globe on a 24 hour basis.

The idea is that as markets sell off then implied volatility expands on options pricing, which lowers the convexity on a payout.

As you roll those put options you now need to pay a higher premium.

When you are just going short intra-day with futures you do not need to pay that premium, it is simply a directional bet.

The reason we like all four of these in concert is because there are so many path dependencies to a market sell off and we want to try to capture that move as best as we can and not rely on an individual path dependency, an individual strategy, or an individual manager.

We look at all these strategies through the triangle of trade offs between: carry, certainty, and convexity.

If you chose one or two of these, you are losing the others.

As a rough example: Tail Risk Puts have a lot of certainty and convexity, but a negative carry.

With Long Vol Options you are reducing the carry, but lessening the certainty.

At a simplistic level we can look at the portfolio in 3 phases: during risk on times the Tail Risk and Long Vol options are going to have a negative carry or bleed.

We use the pairs trade style income to make up for this bleed.

In a sell off, the options pay out with convexity, but now the premium or cost is much higher to re-establish the position, so we like the delta-1 directional play of the Short Index Futures.

We like the ensemble of being in three distinct markets with different personalities: VIX, Options, and Index Futures.

Bitcoins stacked on top of each other
Source: Pixabay

Crypto In The Portfolio

I love the fact that the Cockroach Portfolio has a small bullseye with space for both gold and crypto.

I think most investors are familiar with what gold provides in terms of an investment strategy but are often dumbfounded by crypto.
Is crypto a bit of a wildcard allocation within the portfolio?
Kind of a let’s keep an open-mind and stay curious to see what happens in this volatile space or does it represent a specific strategy moving forward?
Additionally, have you found investors are open minded to having a bit of crypto or is it a dealbreaker for some?

20% of our Cockroach Portfolio is allocated to Fiat Hedges.

It’s 16% Gold and 4% Crypto.

The crypto is weighted to market cap and we only use the futures.

So, currently that is about 2.5% BTC and 1.5% ETH.

As we are focused on a portfolio that manages our client’s savings through multiple business cycle and multiple decades, we also worry about multiple generations.

It’s not necessarily the asset classes that people invest in that hurts them over longer time horizons, it’s the dislocations that happen due to things like war, confiscation, and diasporas.

We think about our Fiat Hedge for those once in a lifetime event risks.

At the same time we are rebalancing frequently so they do add to our portfolio diversification and are simultaneously thought of as trading instruments.

Our main focus is always on position sizing.

We try to appropriately position size our gold in case of one of these once in a generation events.

The crypto positions are also based on what if the proponents are correct and BTC is a form of digital gold?

No one can know in advance what would be the exact amount of exponential return from either of these asset classes, yet we feel our allocation size is broadly appropriate given an unknown, unknowns scenario.

We found the responses to holding crypto futures are highly dependent on the individual.

BTC is by far the most polarizing asset and people are either evangelical or absolutely appalled by it.

We feel that this is not binary, so we take an appropriate position size with an open mind about the future.

Once again, we believe in diversifying our diversifiers.

And proper diversification means you, and financial media, will always hate at least one of the asset classes you currently hold.

Two ladies sitting down and chatting in La Paz, Bolivia
Two ladies sitting down and chatting in La Paz, Bolivia

Living Abroad: Investing + Life Lessons

Jason, it was really cool to find out that you spent time abroad for a while.
Where did you go and what did you do while you were away from the US?

How did living/traveling overseas impact you as an investor and more importantly as an individual?

I’ve lived all over the US, Europe, and Latin America.

I’ve done many different things while abroad from: teaching english, selling Turkish rugs on the streets of Istanbul, living at a soccer academy in Bolivia, running online businesses, to selling condos in Mexico.

I will not be the first to point this out but travel brings out resiliency and open mindedness.

If you are open minded to how life operates in different ways there is often an opportunity to incorporate a better model.

When you are traveling and living in developed countries you learn how to go with the flow when you can’t count on your electricity or water to work every time or the mind numbing bureaucracy when you need to get something official done.

I would be remiss if I also didn’t point out the other side.

People exalt things like being a traveler over a tourist.

Living abroad is seen only as a net benefit.

I think about the obvious, I have only had my own subjective experience.

Even though I lived in Brazil for a long time, I cannot tell you anything about Brazil, I can only tell you about my subjective experience while in Brazil.

After traveling to emerging countries one does feel incredibly grateful, but it has always amazed my how quickly that wears off when we rejoin the hedonic treadmill.

A lot of people travel as an escape, where they may possibly find more verdant, unknown landscapes within their own psyche, just by “sitting alone in a room quietly”.

Connect with Jason Buck

Thanks so much for taking the time to do this Jason!

How can people find you across the myriad of platforms you’re creating content on these days?

Sam, I just want to thank you for the opportunity!

Especially because I am a fan of the courage you and Audrey display via all of the content you produce.

You can find us at MutinyFund.com and I am @JasonMutiny on Twitter.

(Sam speaking here. Jason is one of the most prolific content creators on YouTube where he effortlessly slips between the roles of host, co-host and guest on a number of shows. 


Source: Mutiny Fund Podcast on YouTube

Be sure to check out Mutiny Funds Podcast.


The Pirates of Finance on Blockworks Macro on YouTube

And the weekly show Pirates of Finance on Blockworks Macro


Source: The Derivative by RCM Alternatives on YouTube

Also, Jason is frequently a guest/host on The Derivative by RCM Alternatives and Real Vision Finance.)


Source: Real Vision On YouTube

More from Nomadic Samuel
The Magic of Combining Leveraged Stocks and Gold in Your Portfolio
As investors we’re well aware of what happens when you combine stocks...
Read More
Join the Conversation

28 Comments

  1. says: Geoffrey

    Hi Sam,

    I found the interview with Jason and Tyler regarding the Cockroach portfolio very interesting. I’ve been aware of Mutiny Funds for some time now, but this All-weather approach is somewhat new. What is a little confusing is the allocation percentages with respect to the Gold/Crypto fiat protection. If each quadrant is allocated 25% each, how do they incorporate 20% additionally in Gold/Crypto? Is there some leverage involved or is the Trend bucket less than 25%? Or, are all quadrants equal but less than 25%, making room for the gold/crypto allocation? Also, I suspect that the nature of this strategy would make creating a Cockroach ETF quite complicated with respect to some of the quadrants. Still, I wonder if they have considered this? Many thanks for providing such interesting content and any clarification of the portfolio as you understand it.

Leave a comment
Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.