Imagine skipping over one of the most popular alternative funds ($RPAR ETF) ever created to first review its bolder more brash younger sibling?
That’s exactly what we’re going to do today by reviewing the Ultra Risk Parity ETF (Ticker: $UPAR) – an all-weather leveraged portfolio positioning itself as a risk parity solution that seeks higher returns than equities with comparable risk.
Ultra Risk Parity Fund | UPAR ETF Review (Leveraged Portfolio that Outperforms Stocks?)
Introduction to a Portfolio of Various Asset Classes
The way I like to think about this fund is through the scenario of being invited to a picnic.
You were asked to only bring wine and baguette but instead you show up with additional bags full of gourmet chocolate, grapes, salami and cheese.
You’re instantly the hero of the small gathering before conversation even begins.
When I think of typical milquetoast portfolios consisting of just two ingredients (stocks + bonds) and compare it to what is under the hood of $UPAR (global stocks + bonds + tips + gold + commodities) it’s hard for me to factor why investors would feel comfortable diversifying between just two asset classes.
Hey guys! Here is the part where I mention I’m a freakin’ travel blogger! This ETF review is entirely for entertainment purposes only. Do your own due diligence and research while consulting with a financial advisor before considering securities mentioned on this site. Seriously, I’m a travel blogger not a financial professional, so take what I say with a grain of salt; okay? Cheers! 😉
What is a Risk Parity Portfolio?
What is Risk-Parity style investing? It is dividing a portfolio into uncorrelated asset slabs while allocating specifically based on the asset classes risk/return profile.
For asset classes like Stocks and Commodities (gold) that experience higher standard deviation the portion they take up in the portfolio is smaller than the allocation to Bonds and Tips to balance out the risk proportionally.
In other words, each asset class component is owned in proportion to the amount of risk it takes up in the portfolio:
Less risk = greater slab of pie.
More risk = smaller slab of pie.
For more information it is worth reading Alex Shahidi’s book (Risk Parity: How To Invest In All Market Environments) where he outlines the strategy of this style of investing and his fund $RPAR in greater detail.
Actually Alex Shahidi and Damien Bisserier, the founders of the fund, do a superb job of explaining the concept of risk parity in several YouTube interviews.
Since risk parity is not as common knowledge for most investors hopefully this will help aid in learning more about this style of return stacked investing: (deep dive podcast)
Source: Friends over at Resolve Riffs: Check out their YouTube channel (I’m a big fan): RESOLVE RIFFS
What is an All-Weather Portfolio?
What exactly is an All-Weather Portfolio or All-Seasons Portfolio?
In a nutshell, it is a portfolio that has been balanced in such a way with historically uncorrelated assets that can perform under any economic regime.
In order to understand this completely you have to think of the following 4 scenarios:
- High growth and high inflation regime = inflationary boom
- High growth and low inflation regime = disinflationary boom.
- Low growth and high inflation regime = stagflation.
- Low growth and low inflation regime = deflationary bust.
For further reading on the difference economic regimes check out this blog post by InvestResolve.
Ray Dalio is the investor most well known and credited for all-weather portfolios.
Here is a brief video of him explaining how he constructs his all-weather portfolio:
Source: Investopedia with guest Ray Dalio
Most portfolios are prepared for only the first two examples given (disinflationary boom and inflationary boom) and not stagflation and deflationary bust.
When a scenario like the 70s or 2000s presents itself to investors with turbulent stock markets, massive drawdowns for equities and potentially high inflation how is a portfolio of just stocks and bonds going to shield an investor from anemic returns?
Hence, the goal of an all-weather portfolio is to have enough uncorrelated asset classes in a given portfolio to be able to handle all four environments.
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF Fund Overview, Holdings and Info
The investment case for “UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF” has been laid out succinctly by the folks over at Evoke: (source: fund landing page)
“Access the same risk parity strategy as RPAR but with a higher target return and risk.”
- “The fund will diversify its allocations amongst four asset classes – equities, commodities, Treasury bonds (Treasuries), and Treasury inflation-protected securities (TIPS).”
- “Portfolio is structured to target a risk comparable to equities.”
- “Seeks to generate positive returns during periods of economic growth, preserve capital during periods of economic contraction, and preserve real rates of return during periods of heightened inflation.”
UPAR ETF Ultra Risk Parity Fund: Principal Investment Strategy
To better understand the process of how the fund operates, let’s turn our attention towards the prospectus (source: summary prospectus)
Principal Investment Strategies of the Fund
$UPAR INDEX + EXPOSURE + EXPENSE RATIO
$UPAR is one of the newest efficient core funds available in the ETF marketplace having just been launched on January 4th, 2022.
It has the same framework as $RPAR, tracking the Advanced Research Ultra Risk Parity Index, but with 1.4 times the exposure and an overall leverage of 1.68. Finally, it has a gross expense ratio of 0.68%.
HOLDING IN $UPAR ULTRA RISK PARITY ETF
So what exactly do we have under the hood? You’ll notice instantly that $UPAR is broken down into 4 main categories of EQUITIES + BONDS + TIPS + COMMODITIES with further elements of diversification under the sub-heading of each category.
1) STOCKS = 35%
A) USA = 17.5% B) INT DEV = 7% C) EM = 10.5%
2) COMMODITIES = 35%
A) Commodity Producer Equities = 21% B) Gold = 14%
3) BONDS = 49%
4) TIPS = 49%
Immediately what is apparent is a commitment to global diversification amongst equities.
With only half of the stock allocation belonging to US equities (17.5%) the other half (17.5%) is a combination of Emerging market equities (10.5%) and International Developed market equities at (7%).
One of the more fascinating components of this arrangement is a greater weight towards Emerging Markets stocks than International Developed stocks.
My guess would be that it is because Emerging markets equities have historically had lower correlations to the US stock market.
If that is indeed the reason for this specific allocation, I’m in favour of it given it that it further diversifies the portfolio.
The commodities section of the portfolio is equally as interesting.
The combination of commodity producing equities and gold creates a fascinating duo of commodity exposure in the portfolio.
From a diversification standpoint, I’m again in favour of the arrangement.
Going all in on gold as an alternative investment class has been rewarding in the 21st century (especially the 2000s) but one ought to be aware of its drawdown potential from the 80s and 90s.
Treasuries and TIPS being the least volatile of the 4 asset classes make up the final component of this portfolio.
These asset classes are most likely to bring stability to the portfolio when equities and/or commodities are struggling.
SIMULATED ULTRA RISK PARITY PERFORMANCE
The simulated back-tests from 4/30/1998 until 12/31/2021 are where things really get interesting.
Firstly, the benchmark being tracked is the MSCI World Index (global equities) as $UPAR positions itself as a fund that seeks to outperform 100 % equity only indexed portfolios with similar levels of volatility.
Has $UPAR delivered on its mandate from simulated backtests?
Yes. Yes! YES!
And then some.
Since its simulated inception it has returned an impressive 13% CAGR and equally impressive 14% volatility.
Compare that with the MSCI World Index of only 6.6% CAGR and 15.5% volatility.
Ah, the true joys of leveraged uncorrelated assets; I’m not even being sarcastic.
So nearly double the outperformance with slightly less risk. Wow!
UPAR ETF; Target Asset Allocation
Let’s examine things a little more closely decade by decade. Most of $UPAR outperformance came during the tumultuous 2000s when the three year bear market of the early 2000s was followed the worst bear market of the 21st century in 2008.
How did $UPAR perform during this period of extreme volatility for global stocks?
And how about global stocks in the 2000s?
If these results don’t give equity only investors some food for thought I’m not sure what would.
How about the 2010s when stocks came roaring back? $UPAR still wins this race.
CAGR of 10.1% vs 9.5%.
It should be important to note that S&P investors in the 2010s would have enjoyed better returns than global equities or simulated $UPAR.
I guess the takeaway message though is that in a decade like the 2000s which was a total lost cause for global stocks (and especially US stocks) $UPAR thrived and in decades where the stock market is roaring $UPAR has enough diversification (and other moving parts within its portfolio) to overcome a struggling decade for commodities and still produce impressive results.
Let’s consider a few years in particular:
$UPAR vs GLOBAL EQUITIES
2000: +7.7% vs -13.2
2001: +4.7% vs -16.8%
2002: +22.7% vs -19.9%
2008: -16.4% vs -40.7%
2013: -10.8% vs +26.7%
$UPAR was above water in the early 2000s during the three year bear market for global equities.
2002 is a particularly important year given that the fund would have hypothetically outperformed by over +40%.
The worst year of all for global equities in 2008 was also a down year for $UPAR albeit far less jarring.
Now to show I’m not being entirely biased by cherry picking certain years of $UPAR domination check out 2013.
In 2013 this is a perfect example of how you’d have to endure serious tracking error while friends and neighbors may be celebrating +26.7% returns while you’d be down -10.8% for the year.
When you own a very different style of portfolio you have to be prepared for an extreme variety of results.
UPAR ETF Review: Pros and Cons
- An all-weather portfolio risk parity solution that offers inflationary protection for stagflationary environments
- Portfolio that is broken down equally by risk (standard deviation) so higher allocations to bonds/tips and lower to stocks/commodities
- Diversification into asset classes that break the shackles of merely stocks plus bonds
- Tax efficient and cost efficient potential total portfolio solution that involves no rebalancing as a DIY investor
- Exposure to alternative asset classes that aren’t typically part of portfolios (TIPS + GOLD + COMMODITIES)
- Enough leverage 1.68% that even with a conservative allocation to equities (39%) = chance to outperform 100% stock funds
- Opportunity to combine this strategy of risk-parity with other strategies in your portfolio (60/40) or trend following creating a multi-strategy solution
- Leverage averse investors with tendencies towards being impatient or succumbing to recency bias and loss aversion should stay far away from this fund or consider the tamer $RPAR version
- During high growth and low inflationary regimes there is the potential for significant tracking error and investors need to understand this fund is not going to outperform under this scenario.
- The fund even though it is leveraged may not include enough exposure to equities to satisfy certain investors desires to stay in the balanced 60% or growth 80% allocation range
- There will be certain years where commodities will create significant drag in the portfolio nearly cancelling out a roaring year for equities. Ex: 2013
HOW DOES $UPAR FIT INTO A PORTFOLIO?
TOTAL PORTFOLIO SOLUTION?
Firstly, let’s explore whether or not $UPAR is potentially a total portfolio solution.
In my opinion it certainly has the potential to be just that.
When you compare it to a traditional 60/40 portfolio that is considered by most investors (both professional and amateur alike) to be fully diversified $UPAR brings more items to the picnic.
The additional of inflation focussed assets classes such as TIPS and GOLD along with the addition of COMMODITIES offers a portfolio that has more exposure to different asset classes and strategies than a stock plus bond only portfolio.
It’s more prepared for the full spectrum of economic regimes than 60/40.
Furthermore, a feather in its cap is the fact that equities are truly global in this fund with US accounting for half of the portion whereas International Developed and Emerging markets account for the other half.
In total you’ve got a globally diversified portfolio with exposure to bonds and alternatives in a manner that shares risk amongst the 4 asset classes.
That to me is a portfolio I would feel confident in owning long-term and under any economic regime.
Allocation –> 100% $UPAR
CORE HOLDING OF AN ENHANCED CANVAS PORTFOLIO?
One interesting combination would be to hold $UPAR as half of a risk parity plus 90/60 enhanced canvas portfolio.
Under this scenario the $UPAR component of the portfolio would likely outperform in a 70s or 2000s scenario (stagflation environment) when the stock market is experiencing severe corrections or bear markets; whereas the 90/60 portfolio would shine during stock market prosperity in decades such as the 80s, 90s and 2010s where the more aggressive component of equities would drive outsized returns.
This ying/yang component of a half risk parity and half 90/60 portfolio would also create interesting rebalancing opportunities to refuel the one half of the portfolio that is currently underperforming given the current economic regime.
SMALL PART DIVERSIFIER IN A TRADITIONAL PORTFOLIO
$UPAR could also make an appearance into a portfolio where you’re curious enough about all-weather investing, risk parity investing and/or alternative investments.
But not enough to the point of wanting it to be a core holding. In this case a 5%, 10%, 15% or 20% addition could turn your otherwise milquetoast portfolio into a sudden multi-strategy solution.
5%, 10%, 15% or 20% $UPAR
95, 90, 85 or 80% OTHER
NOMADIC SAMUEL FINAL THOUGHTS
It’s probably rather apparent I’m a huge fan of $UPAR.
I was really excited with the initial launch of $RPAR but I found it a little too conservative for my taste.
The difference between 120% exposure and 168% exposure is going from the potential of equity like returns: with more stability to potentially outperforming equities with similar standard deviation.
If the latter sounds more appealing from a return/risk standpoint than $RPAR would be the ideal choice.
However, given my preferences as an investor I’m long $UPAR with $RPAR not making the cut. I’ll conclude by saying $UPAR is my favourite fund in all of the ETF universe at the moment.
If I had to only choose one fund for the rest of my life, and I’d never do that, it would be $UPAR.
I feel as though it can thrive in any market environment. And I can handle any type of potential tracking error when hypothetically the S&P or another major index might outperform it.
This might sound crazy but I’d own this fund at 200% exposure; if it existed.
Super Duper Ultra Risk Parity anyone?
Long-term I don’t think any 100% equity index can outperform $UPAR nor will it.
Furthermore, 100% equity allocations have all of the risk associated with brutal bear market drawdowns that $UPAR attempts to avoid through significant asset class diversification.
Whether or not you believe what I do is entirely up for you to decide.
Comments are most welcome!
Past performance doesn’t predict future performance. Results can vary greatly. Leverage brings about certain risks that investors need to consider carefully. Also note that for some of the portfolio visualizer back-tests borrowing costs were not factored into the results.
Before adding this fund, or any, to your portfolio be sure to do your homework and due diligence.
Seek the advice of a financial advisor when in doubt and be caution rather than overconfident at all times. Remember, I’m just a freakin’ travel blogger writing about a subject matter I’m passionate about for entertainment purposes only.
I agree with your assessment of UPAR. I am currently an RPAR shareholder, but would prefer UPAR. Unfortunately, the UPAR share volume is not currently high enough for M1 brokerage to offer it, even though the share volume of the underlying holdings are incredibly liquid and sufficient. This is the one feature of M1 that I find really annoying and frustrating, and I wish they would re-think their policy in this respect.
Happy investing Maestro G! Thanks for sharing that. That is indeed frustrating. I hope they’ll re-think that policy and include newer funds. Just out of curiosity what would be your leverage maximum for a risk parity fund?
I don’t think I would want to leverage much more than UPAR’s targets.
It seems to be the right balance as it is. I agree with you. I would maybe go to 200% but that would be it.
alⅼ the time i used tо read smaller posts ԝhich as
welⅼ ｃlear their motive, and that is also happening with this paragraph which I am reading here.
DBMF + UPAR + HRAA (the Resolve ETF in Canada) and a tiny bit of CYA…my perfect mix. Simple, effective and adaptative to anything the market can throw. An ensemble of inflation protections, commodity exposures and rebalancing frequencies. I will maybe never be the best performer but I know that I’m very robust.
Upar use commodities equities (+- 0,60 beta to sp500 following Damien’s comments) instead of commodities futures and it didn’t bring the upside needed this year. Damien and Alex are doing the review are Q1 2022 of UPAR/RPAR this week (may 5th 2022). I’m really looking to their comments.
I don’t know when UPAR will come back into favor in this market regime but during this time DBMF and HRAA bring the necessary upside. I know that UPAR is an important piece of the portfolio and that the bonds will be there when really needed.
Fascinating combination and I really like your selections. I have a lot of those in my portfolio as well. Totally agree with you about UPAR. I did some portfolio visualizer research and noticed only two clear scenarios when stocks and bonds were down together at the same time (1994) and (2022). Otherwise, one or two in the black every other year.
Is it feasible to hold UPAR in a taxable account? How tax efficient is it?
If taxes did not matter, I would love to run something like 25% UPAR; 27.5% NTSX; 27.5% NTSI; 10% DBMF; 10% KMLM, rebalanced quarterly in my taxable. Unfortunately, I may only be able to run that type of portfolio in a tax advantaged account due to tax consideration.
Hi, I log on to your new stuff on a regular basis.
Your story-telling style is awesome, keep it up!