WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund Review (90/60) | NTSX ETF Review

When it comes to creating efficient space in your portfolio few ETFs offer a more compelling solution than WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund.

It takes the classic portfolio 60/40 and applies a modest 1.5X leverage to expand the canvas to a 90/60 configuration.

This affords investors a tremendous amount of flexibility in terms of how they allocate.

For those committed to the 60/40 portfolio it requires only 67% space to accomplish this goal.

90/60 –> 150 X 0.67 = 100% coverage 

The remaining 33% is up for grabs to add whatever else you’d like to the mix.

Most likely alternatives.

However, there is nothing set in stone saying that investors must adhere to the 60/40 portfolio which in my opinion is exciting beyond belief.

Shaking the shackles of stifling benchmarks and the need to conform to industry standards affords investors all kinds of creative opportunities to pursue an expanded canvas portfolio that is to their particular taste.

What does that potentially look like?

Well, that’s entirely up to you.

Maybe you add multi-strategy managed futures, trend-following, market-neutral, long-short equity, merger-arbitrage, gold or bitcoin to the mix.

Or maybe you don’t.

What we’ll try to unpack in this NTSX ETF review is the case for efficient core exposure and the possibilities it presents investors to assemble an expanded canvas portfolio.

Let’s get crackin’!

WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund NTSX ETF Review with Nevada Desert road landscapes
source: jplenio on Pixabay

NTSX ETF Review (90/60 Portfolio) | WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund Review

NTSX ETF Review (90/60 Portfolio) | WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund Review - Digital Art

Hey guys! Here is the part where I mention I’m a travel blogger, vlogger and content creator! This investing opinion blog post ETF Review is entirely for entertainment purposes only. There could be considerable errors in the data I gathered. This is not financial advice. Do your own due diligence and research. Consult with a financial advisor. 

WisdomTree Logo offering innovative investment solutions
source: wisdomtree.com

WisdomTree ETFS | Relentlessly Searching For Better Ways To Invest

To say WisdomTree is one of my favourite ETF providers would be a colossal understatement.

They’re right near the top of the list.

From factor focused investing strategies to efficient core ETFs they have a diverse range of product selection for investors to consider.

An interesting fund that comes to mind is the WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund.

In many regards, WisdomTree is hanging out in frontier research supported territory whereas most other fund providers are more or less all copying each another in a vanilla manner.


source: WisdomTree ETFs on YouTube

The Case For 90/60 Investing | Modestly Leveraged Stocks and Bonds - Digital Art

The Case For 90/60 Investing | Modestly Leveraged Stocks and Bonds

The first thing I’d like to acknowledge is that “leverage” is one of most divisive terms in all of finance.

For investors dialing up single asset class exposure and/or taking concentrated bets it is often the sword they impale themselves upon.

Hence, if you’re leveraging equity only concentrated portfolios good luck to you amigo.

The chances of an unfortunate sequence of returns, that could potentially wipe you out, likely looms around the corner.

However, modestly leveraging historically uncorrelated asset classes to create space in the portfolio for further forms of diversification is an entirely different story.

Firstly, let’s explore historical returns for the 90/60 portfolio versus the classic 60/40 and 100% US equity.

90/60 US Large Cap/10-Year Treasury Portfolio Returns from 1972 until 2022

US Large Cap + 10 Year Treasury Returns at 90/60 Portfolio from 1972 until 2022
source: portfoliovisualizer.com (The investment performance results presented here are based on historical backtesting and are hypothetical. Past performance, whether actual or indicated by historical tests of strategies, is not indicative of future results. The results obtained through backtesting are only theoretical and are provided for informational purposes to illustrate investment strategies under certain conditions and scenarios.)

*Note: I’m not taking into account costs of leverage which would have been more expensive back in the day versus the efficient options now available through cash collateral and futures contracts.*

100% US Large Cap Equity + 60/40 Portfolio Returns from 1972 until 2022

US Large Cap Equities and 60/40 Portfolio Returns from 1972 until 2022
source: portfoliovisualizer.com (The investment performance results presented here are based on historical backtesting and are hypothetical. Past performance, whether actual or indicated by historical tests of strategies, is not indicative of future results. The results obtained through backtesting are only theoretical and are provided for informational purposes to illustrate investment strategies under certain conditions and scenarios.)

90/60 Portfolio vs 100% US Equity vs 60/40

CAGR: 13.66% vs 10.27% vs 9.20%
Stdev: 14.92% vs 15.42% vs 9.95%
Best Year: 52.38% vs 37.45 vs 32.69
Worst Year: -25.66% vs -37.02% vs -17.45
Max Drawdown: -39.08% vs 50.97% vs -27.81%

Thanks to portfolio visualizer we’re able to see the big picture results comparing the 90/60 portfolio versus an all equity 100% US Large Cap and 60/40 portfolio.

It’s obvious to see that a 90/60 portfolio crushes both an all equity and 60/40 portfolio from a returns standpoint of 13.66% vs 10.27% vs 9.20% CAGR.

Most impressive is that the 90/60 portfolio better manages volatility than an all equity allocation with 14.92% vs 15.42% Stdev.

More offensive and defensive?

The good times keep rolling when we compare best year, worst year and max drawdown between the 90/60 versus the all equity portfolio.

It’s not all a free lunch though.

The 90/60 portfolio, given that it is an amplified 60/40, will outperform when times are good and underperform when times are rough compared to the 60/40 portfolio.

That’s just common sense.

Improving portfolio capital efficiency with a 90/60 fund such as NTSX
source: wisdomtree.com (The investment performance results presented here are based on historical backtesting and are hypothetical. Past performance, whether actual or indicated by historical tests of strategies, is not indicative of future results. The results obtained through backtesting are only theoretical and are provided for informational purposes to illustrate investment strategies under certain conditions and scenarios.)

WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund: Principal Investment Strategy - Digital Art

WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund: Principal Investment Strategy

To better understand the process of how the fund operates, let’s turn our attention towards the prospectus (source: summary prospectus).

Principal Investment Strategies of the Fund

The Fund, an exchange traded fund (“ETF”), is actively managed using a models-based approach.

The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing in large-capitalization U.S. equity securities and U.S. Treasury futures contracts.

The Fund invests in a representative basket of U.S. equity securities of large-capitalization companies generally weighted by market capitalization.
Under normal circumstances, the Fund will invest approximately 90% of its net assets in U.S. equity securities.
The remainder of the net assets, which WisdomTree Asset Management, Inc., the Fund’s investment adviser (“WisdomTree Asset Management” or the “Adviser”), expects to be in cash and cash equivalents, will serve as collateral for U.S. Treasury futures contracts’ positions of varying maturities ranging from 2 to 30 years, which are selected to achieve a target duration of 3 to 8 years.
Duration is a measure used to determine the sensitivity of a portfolio to changes in interest rates with a longer duration portfolio being more sensitive to changes in interest rates.
Under normal circumstances, the notional exposure to the aggregate U.S. Treasury futures contracts’ positions will represent approximately 60% of the Fund’s net assets.
The Adviser expects that the level of interest rate risk offered by the weighted positions in the U.S. Treasury futures contracts will be set and maintained at risk levels consistent with intermediate term fixed income securities.
It is anticipated that the U.S. Treasury futures contracts will be rolled as they near expiry into new contracts, with the size of the futures positions at different maturity points adjusted to maintain the desired interest rate risk exposure.
To the extent exposure of the equity and fixed income portions of the Fund deviates from the targeted 90% equity and 60% U.S. Treasury futures contracts allocations noted above by 5% or greater, it is anticipated that the Fund will be rebalanced to more closely align with the original target allocations.
WisdomTree Asset Management uses Standard & Poor’s Global Industry Classification Standards (“S&P GICS”) to define companies within a sector.
The following sectors are included in the Fund: consumer discretionary, consumer staples, energy, financials, health care, industrials, information technology, materials, real estate, communication services, and utilities.
A sector is comprised of multiple industries. For example, the energy sector is comprised of companies in, among others, the natural gas, oil and petroleum industries.
As of September 30, 2018, a significant portion of the Fund was comprised of companies in the financial and health care sectors.”
Why Consider NTSX ETF? - Digital Art

Why Consider NTSX ETF?

Why consider NTSX ETF as a potential portfolio solution?

Let’s examine what WisdomTree has to say via its fund landing page.

“The WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund* seeks total return by investing in large-capitalization U.S. equity securities and U.S. Treasury futures contracts.

  1. Gain enhanced exposure to U.S. equities with added bond futures diversification to potentially lower volatility
  2. Use to help boost capital efficiency in asset allocation allowing for increased exposure to non-core / diversifying investments
  3. Use to help satisfy demand for overlay strategies that remain highly correlated to common portfolio benchmarks
    *Formerly known as the WisdomTree 90/60 U.S. Balanced Fund”

Out of the three reasons given I think it would be wise to key in specifically on key point #2.

Boosting capital efficiency and associated portfolio real-estate space via a 90/60 fund is really the name of the game.

Assuming you’re a savvy enough investor to consider a strategy such as managed futures, let’s explore how a capital efficient allocation to a leveraged stocks/bond pairs with a stocks/managed futures combination.

50% NTSX + 50% BLNDX

90/60 equities/bonds + 50/100 equities/managed futures

Expanded Canvas Portfolio 150%: 70% equities / 50% managed futures / 30% Treasury

NTSX 50% + BLNDX 50% vs VBIAX 100%

NTSX 50% + BLNDX 50% versus VBIAX 60/40
source: portfoliovisualizer.com (The investment performance results presented here are based on historical backtesting and are hypothetical. Past performance, whether actual or indicated by historical tests of strategies, is not indicative of future results. The results obtained through backtesting are only theoretical and are provided for informational purposes to illustrate investment strategies under certain conditions and scenarios.)

By adding an uncorrelated managed futures trend-following strategy to the mix (in an expanded canvas portfolio) the combination of NTSX + BLNDX skewers the 60/40 Portfolio as represented by VBIAX mutual fund.

CAGR: 10.21% vs 3.36%
RISK: 13.46% vs 14.32%
BEST YEAR: 21.13% vs 16.40%
WORST YEAR: -9.82 vs -17.39
MAX DRAWDOWN: -13.53% vs -20.78
SHARPE RATIO: 0.74 vs 0.26
SORTINO RATIO: 1.28 vs 0.37
MARKET CORRELATION: 0.94 vs 0.99

When NTSX ETF is utilized as intended (as an efficient diversification building block) it pairs beautifully with uncorrelated strategies.

Notice how the expanded canvas portfolio dominates in every single category ranging from CAGR to RISK along with SHARPE RATIO to SORTINO RATIO?

NTSX + BLNDX annual returns versus the 60/40 portfolio
source: portfoliovisualizer.com (The investment performance results presented here are based on historical backtesting and are hypothetical. Past performance, whether actual or indicated by historical tests of strategies, is not indicative of future results. The results obtained through backtesting are only theoretical and are provided for informational purposes to illustrate investment strategies under certain conditions and scenarios.)

2020 Returns: 20.58% vs 16.40%
2021 Returns: 21.13% vs 14.22%
2022 Returns: -9.82 vs -17.39%

It outperforms the 60/40 every single year when times have been good (2020-21) and bad (2022).

WisdomTree Efficient Core Capital Efficient ETFs Roster
source: wisdomtree.com (The investment performance results presented here are based on historical backtesting and are hypothetical. Past performance, whether actual or indicated by historical tests of strategies, is not indicative of future results. The results obtained through backtesting are only theoretical and are provided for informational purposes to illustrate investment strategies under certain conditions and scenarios.)

Complete Capital Efficient WisdomTree Roster of ETFs - Digital Art

Complete Capital Efficient WisdomTree Roster of ETFs

Before we dive into the nitty gritty details of NTSX let’s first briefly highlight the entire roster of capital efficient ETFs WisdomTree has on tap.

NTSX  – WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund (90/60 US Equities / Treasury Futures)
NTSI – WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (90/60 Int-Dev Equities / Treasury Futures)
NTSE – WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (90/60 Emerging Equities / Treasury Futures)
GDE – WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (90/90 US Equites / Gold Futures)
GDMN – WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (90/90 Gold Miner Equities / Gold Futures)

The current roster is most impressive as it provides investors with the puzzle pieces to efficiently add US, International Developed and Emerging Markets equities handcuffed with either treasury and/or gold exposure.

The one exception that deserves a bit more attention to unpack is GDMN ETF which combines Gold Miner Equities with Gold Futures for the ultimate Gold Bug Combo.

My sincerest hope is that the roster continues to expand to possibly include some of the great factor funds WisdomTree has available such as its Quality Dividend Growth Series.

NTSX ETF Overview, Holdings and Info - Digital Art

NTSX ETF Overview, Holdings and Info

Let’s pop open the hood of NTSX ETF to see what kind of goodies we have inside!

We can find out straight from the fund fact sheet:

How NTSX ETF Creates A 90/60 Portfolio Configuration - Digital Art

How NTSX ETF Creates A 90/60 Portfolio Configuration

So how does WisdomTree expand the canvas of the portfolio to 150% where it can hold 90% US equities and 60% Treasury Futures?

  1. “The Funds invest 90% of their net assets in the 500 largest stocks in their respective region by market capitalization.
  2. The Funds invest 10% in short-term fixed income that collateralizes a 60% notional exposure to U.S. Treasury futures (using a 2-, 5-, 10-, 30-year bond ladder).
  3. Should the Funds deviate from the targeted 90% equity and 60% U.S. Treasury allocations by 5%, the fund will be rebalanced back to target allocations.”

To sum this up in one sentence the fund invests in the 500 largest US stocks by market capitalization and utilizes a 10% collateral that allows the fund to gain 60% notional exposure to a variety of US Treasury futures.

90% US Equities 
60% Notional US Treasury Futures
10% Collateral 

NTSX WisdomTree Notional Exposure to Treasury Futures including 2YR NOTE, 5 YR NOTE, 10 YR NOTE and US Long Bond
source: wisdomtree.com (The investment performance results presented here are based on historical backtesting and are hypothetical. Past performance, whether actual or indicated by historical tests of strategies, is not indicative of future results. The results obtained through backtesting are only theoretical and are provided for informational purposes to illustrate investment strategies under certain conditions and scenarios.)

Above you’ll notice how the fund has exposure to a diverse range of treasury futures ranging from the US 2 Year Note to the US Long Bond.

NTSX ETF Top 10 Holdings

NTSX Top 10 Fund Holdings
source: wisdomtree.com

Here we can notice the top 10 US equity holdings for NTSX ETF.

We have Apple taking up considerable space at 7.10% while Exxon Mobil rounds things out at 1.22%

NTSX Info

Ticker: NTSX
Number of Stocks: 500
Net Expense Ratio: 0.20
Distributions: Quarterly
AUM: 729.3 Million
Inception: 08/02/2018 

It’s great to see that investors have supported the 90/60 funds with NTSX accumulating an impressive 729.3 Million AUM.

Moreover, they’ve found a way to keep costs rock bottom with a Net Expense Ratio of just 0.20.

For investors seeking income, WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund ETF will provide quarterly distributions.

NTSX ETF – Sector Exposure

NTSX ETF Sector Exposure
source: morningstar.com

Here you’ll notice NTSX ETF lining up neatly with other US Large Cap index funds with Technology, Healthcare and Financial services leading the way.

The fund has its lowest sector exposures to Utilities, Basic Materials and Real Estate.

WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund Performance - Digital Art

WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund Performance

WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund versus Vanguard Balanced Index Admiral Shares
source: portfoliovisualizer.com (The investment performance results presented here are based on historical backtesting and are hypothetical. Past performance, whether actual or indicated by historical tests of strategies, is not indicative of future results. The results obtained through backtesting are only theoretical and are provided for informational purposes to illustrate investment strategies under certain conditions and scenarios.)

As one might expect the 90/60 WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund ETF has outperformed a general 60/40 fund (in this case Vanguard Balanced Index).

Its performance is amplified during good times AND bad times.

Noteworthy is the range between its best and worst years have a much wider gap than the 60/40 portfolio.

However, if you were to utilize the fund with its “best practices” intended use in mind you’d allocate 67% for 100% notional 60/40 exposure and then allocate 33% to another uncorrelated strategy.

Thus, we’ll pair NTSX at 67% with PQTIX at 33% to accomplish just that.

NTSX 67% + PQTIX 33% vs Vanguard Balanced Fund
source: portfoliovisualizer.com (The investment performance results presented here are based on historical backtesting and are hypothetical. Past performance, whether actual or indicated by historical tests of strategies, is not indicative of future results. The results obtained through backtesting are only theoretical and are provided for informational purposes to illustrate investment strategies under certain conditions and scenarios.)

What a difference this makes!

Not only do we gain 170 basis points of CAGR (11.11% vs 12.81%) but the combination forms a defensive powerhouse gaining 770 basis points of risk management (18.39% vs 10.69% Stdev).

Returns outpace risk and the best and worst year compress for less of a rollercoaster ride.

NTSX Pros and Cons
source: pixabay

NTSX ETF Pros and Cons

Let’s examine the pros and cons of WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund ETF.

NTSX Pros

  1. The ability to leverage the classic 60/40 portfolio at 1.5X to create a 150% expanded canvas product
  2. The space that 150% canvas product creates in the portfolio for additional uncorrelated alternative investments
  3. The ability to allocate only 67% of your portfolio real-estate to capture a notional 60/40 portfolio allocation
  4. The opportunity to add “alternative investments” to your portfolio without having to shave down your equity and bond exposure
  5. The capacity to shake the shackles of the 60/40 mandate and allocate your NTSX ETF puzzle piece in whichever way you want
  6. A rock bottom expense ratio of only 0.20 which is head and shoulders above its competition in the efficient core portfolio space
  7. An opportunity to consider the “other” efficient core product range to pair NTSX with NTSI, NTSE, GDE and GDMN for a globally diversified portfolio with additional exposure to gold
  8. A chance to support an innovative ETF provider in WisdomTree that offers an impressive selection of funds for investors to consider

NTSX Cons

  1. A year like 2022 is challenging where the extra oomph (leverage) contributes to the woes of the 60/40 portfolio in a 90/60 configuration where bad gets a bit ugly
  2. Certain investors will not use the product as intended and might freak-out and not have the chin to endure a challenging sequence of returns when leverage amplifies damage during market duress

NTSX Potential Portfolio Solutions - Digital Art

NTSX Potential Portfolio Solutions

These asset allocation ideas and model portfolios presented herein are purely for entertainment purposes only. This is NOT investment advice. These models are hypothetical and are intended to provide general information about potential ways to organize a portfolio based on theoretical scenarios and assumptions. They do not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation/goals, risk tolerance and/or specific needs of any particular individual. 

Now that we’ve taken a thorough look at NTSX ETF let’s see how it can potentially fit into a portfolio at large.

2 Fund Portfolio Solution

For investors seeking a simple 2 fund portfolio solution the following may be of interest:

50% NTSX 90/60
50% BLNDX 50/100

Here we’d take the 90/60 US Equities / Treasury and pair it with 50/100 Global Equities / Managed Futures.

Overall, we’d get a 70/30/50 configuration of equities, bonds and managed futures exposure.

If you wanted less home country bias you’d expand the roster to 4 funds and allocate along these lines:

25% NTSX 90/60
15% NTSI 90/60
10% NTSE 90/60
50% BLNDX 50/100

WisdomTree Efficient Core Total Portfolio Solution - Digital Art

WisdomTree Efficient Core Total Portfolio Solution

For investors who find Managed Futures a bit too esoteric to their taste and would prefer Gold as an alternative, the WisdomTree efficient core family has you covered from head to toe.

30% GDE 90/90
30% NTSX 90/60
25% NTSI 90/60
15% NTSE 90/60

Here you’d have an overall exposure of 90% equities, 42% bonds and 27% gold.

Expanded Canvas Diversified Quant - Digital Art

Expanded Canvas Diversified Quant

For those who flip the bird towards benchmarks (myself included) a maximally diversified expanded canvas portfolio might look a bit like this:

10% NTSX
10% GDE
10% NTSI
10% NTSE
30% BLNDX
10% LBAY
10% BTAL
10% ARB

Here we’d have a globally diversified portfolio with 51% Equity, 30% Managed Futures, 18% Treasury, 10% Market Neutral, 10% Long-Short Equity, 10% Merger-Arbitrage and 9% Gold.

What Others Have To Say About NTSX ETF - Digital Art

What Others Have To Say About NTSX ETF

Now that we’ve covered a few different portfolio solutions let’s see what others have to say about the fund for those who prefer video format.


source: Corey On Investing YouTube


source: Optimized Portfolio YouTube

It’s time for final thoughts to wrap up this fund review.

Nomadic Samuel eating street food in Tokyo, Japan
Nomadic Samuel eating street food in Tokyo, Japan

Nomadic Samuel Final Thoughts

It may come as a surprise to you that NTSX ETF doesn’t make it into my DIY Quant Portfolio.

But there is a good reason for that!

It’s because I have the 90/90 US Equities and Gold combination that the more underrated GDE ETF offers.

Furthermore, I allocate to NTSI and NTSE to increase the global diversification within my equity sleeve.

But I’m still a huge fan of NTSX ETF overall.

The concept of expanding the portfolio to create space for uncorrelated sources of returns is at the cutting edge of creating the most efficient, robust and resilient portfolio as a retail investor.

This is where enhanced returns and risk management collide.

Anyhow, we’re at 2284 words so it’s about time to wrap things up.

What do you think of NTSX ETF and the entire roster of efficient core products WisdomTree offers?

Does it make the grade into your portfolio?

Please let me know in the comments below.

That’s all I’ve got.

Ciao for now.

Important Information

Investment Disclaimer: The content provided here is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, tax or professional advice. Investments carry risks and are not guaranteed; errors in data may occur. Past performance, including backtest results, does not guarantee future outcomes. Please note that indexes are benchmarks and not directly investable. All examples are purely hypothetical. Do your own due diligence. You should conduct your own research and consult a professional advisor before making investment decisions. 

“Picture Perfect Portfolios” does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information in this post and is not responsible for any financial losses or damages incurred from relying on this information. Investing involves the risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. When it comes to capital efficiency, using leverage (or leveraged products) in investing amplifies both potential gains and losses, making it possible to lose more than your initial investment. It involves higher risk and costs, including possible margin calls and interest expenses, which can adversely affect your financial condition. The views and opinions expressed in this post are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of anyone else. You can read my complete disclaimer here

More from Nomadic Samuel
Why Managed Futures Deserve a Place in Your Portfolio
In the diverse world of investing, managed futures have steadily carved out...
Read More
Join the Conversation

3 Comments

  1. says: Chris

    I like NTSX but don’t see a point in holding it since I already have UPAR which holds levered up equities, treasuries and more.

  2. says: Sam

    One other negative is it’s pretty biased in only delivering dividends on the equity exposure. So, while it’s 1.5x in terms of price exposure, it only delivers ~56% of the dividends of a 60/40 portfolio.

Leave a comment
Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *