Price to Earnings Ratio: Unpacking P/E Ratio for Value Investors

If you’re a value investor, you probably know that finding undervalued stocks is a lot like a treasure hunt. And one of the most valuable tools in your treasure chest is the Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E Ratio).

The P/E Ratio is a metric that measures the price of a company’s stock compared to its earnings per share (EPS). In simpler terms, it tells you how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of a company’s earnings. This is an important metric because it can give you insight into a company’s profitability and growth potential.

But why is the P/E Ratio so important for value investors? Well, it can help you identify companies that may be undervalued or overvalued by the market. A low P/E Ratio suggests that a stock may be undervalued, while a high P/E Ratio suggests that a stock may be overvalued. By comparing a company’s P/E Ratio to its historical average or to other companies in the same industry, you can get a better understanding of its true value.

In this article, we’ll dive deeper into the P/E Ratio and explore how value investors can use this metric to find potential investment opportunities. We’ll also discuss the limitations and cons of the P/E Ratio, as well as how it compares to other ratios like the Price to Book Ratio and Dividend Yield. So let’s put on our investing hats and get started!

Price To Earnings Ratio: How To Calculate P/E Ratio

To calculate the P/E Ratio, you’ll need to know a company’s stock price and its earnings per share (EPS). Here’s the formula:

P/E Ratio = Stock Price / Earnings Per Share (EPS)

For example, if a company has a stock price of $50 and an EPS of $5, its P/E Ratio would be:

P/E Ratio = 50 / 5 = 10

This means that investors are willing to pay $10 for every $1 of earnings generated by the company.

It’s important to note that the P/E Ratio can be calculated using either historical earnings or forward earnings estimates. Historical earnings are the company’s earnings over the past 12 months, while forward earnings estimates are projections of the company’s future earnings.

When using forward earnings estimates, it’s important to consider the reliability of the projections and any potential risks or uncertainties that could impact the company’s earnings in the future. This is why some value investors prefer to use historical earnings when calculating the P/E Ratio, as it provides a more reliable and accurate valuation of the company.

P/E Ratio: Some Hypothetical Examples

Let’s get super cheesy with some real life examples over here!

Let’s say you’re a value investor looking to buy stocks in the technology industry. You come across two companies: TechyTuesdayCo and SoftwareSaturday Inc. TechyTuesdayCo has a stock price of $100 and an EPS of $5, while SoftwareSaturday Inc. has a stock price of $50 and an EPS of $2.

To calculate TechyTuesdayCo’s P/E Ratio, you would divide its stock price by its EPS:

P/E Ratio = 100 / 5 = 20

So investors are willing to pay $20 for every $1 of earnings generated by TechCo.

For Software Inc., the calculation would be:

P/E Ratio = 50 / 2 = 25

This means that investors are willing to pay $25 for every $1 of earnings generated by SoftwareSaturday Inc.

Now, at first glance, you might think that TechyTuesdayCo is the better investment opportunity because it has a lower P/E Ratio. However, it’s important to dig deeper and consider other factors like the companies’ growth potential, financial health, and industry trends before making a decision.

But wait, there’s more! Let’s add some humour to this discussion. Imagine you’re trying to explain the P/E Ratio to your grandma who is not familiar with investing. You might say something like:

“Hey, Grandma, have you ever sold a lemonade for 50 cents and made a profit of 10 cents? That means your P/E Ratio was 5! You made a profit of 10 cents for every 50 cents of revenue. Now imagine if you could sell lemonade for $10 and still make a profit of 10 cents. Your P/E Ratio would be 100! That’s how investors think about the P/E Ratio for stocks.”

Okay, maybe that’s a bit cheesy, but you get the idea. The P/E Ratio is a simple yet powerful tool that can help value investors evaluate a company’s valuation and potential for growth.

Pros of Price to Earnings: Advantages Of P/E Ratio

As a value investor, the P/E Ratio can be a valuable tool in your investment analysis toolkit. Here are some of the advantages of using the P/E Ratio:

1. Quick and Easy to Calculate: The P/E Ratio is a simple and straightforward metric that is easy to calculate. You only need two pieces of information: the stock price and the earnings per share (EPS). This makes it a great starting point for value investors who are looking to quickly screen potential investment opportunities.
2. Valuation Tool: The P/E Ratio is primarily used as a valuation tool. It allows investors to compare the price of a stock to its earnings and assess whether the stock is overvalued or undervalued. A low P/E Ratio may indicate that a stock is undervalued and a good buy, while a high P/E Ratio may indicate that a stock is overvalued and a potential sell.
3. Comparative Analysis: The P/E Ratio can also be used for comparative analysis. Investors can compare a company’s P/E Ratio to its peers or to the overall market to determine how it stacks up. This can help investors identify companies that are undervalued or overvalued relative to their peers or the market.
4. Forward-Looking: The P/E Ratio can also be forward-looking, as investors can use forward earnings estimates to calculate the ratio. This can help investors get a sense of a company’s potential earnings growth and future profitability. However, it’s important to note that forward earnings estimates may be less reliable than historical earnings, as they are based on projections and subject to change.
5. Consideration of Market Sentiment: The P/E Ratio can also be a reflection of market sentiment. A high P/E Ratio may indicate that investors are optimistic about a company’s future prospects, while a low P/E Ratio may indicate that investors are pessimistic. As a value investor, this can be valuable information when evaluating a potential investment opportunity.

It’s important to note that the P/E Ratio should not be used in isolation and should be considered alongside other metrics and factors. For example, a company with a low P/E Ratio may also have high levels of debt or poor financial health, which could make it a risky investment. As with any investment decision, it’s important to conduct thorough research and analysis before making a decision.

source: Let’s Talk Money! with Joseph Hogue, CFA on YouTube

Cons of Price to Earnings: Drawbacks Of P/E Ratio

While the P/E Ratio can be a useful tool for value investors, it’s important to understand its limitations and drawbacks. Here are some of the cons of using the P/E Ratio:

1. Inaccurate Comparisons: The P/E Ratio can be inaccurate when comparing companies in different industries or sectors. This is because companies in different industries may have different levels of profitability or growth potential, making it difficult to make apples-to-apples comparisons. Additionally, companies in different sectors may have different P/E Ratio norms, making it difficult to determine what is considered “high” or “low” for a particular company.
2. Fluctuating Earnings: The P/E Ratio can also be affected by fluctuations in earnings. For example, a company may have a high P/E Ratio during a period of strong earnings growth, but a low P/E Ratio during a period of weak earnings. This can make it difficult to determine the true value of a company over the long term.
3. Limited Information: The P/E Ratio only takes into account earnings per share, and does not consider other important metrics such as revenue, cash flow, or debt levels. This can limit the amount of information available to investors when making investment decisions.
4. Historical Analysis: The P/E Ratio is based on historical earnings data, which may not be indicative of future earnings potential. As a result, the P/E Ratio may not accurately reflect a company’s current or future earnings prospects.
5. Accounting Methods: The P/E Ratio can also be affected by different accounting methods used by companies. For example, companies that use aggressive accounting methods may have higher earnings per share, leading to a lower P/E Ratio. However, this may not accurately reflect the company’s true earnings potential.
6. Market Volatility: The P/E Ratio can be affected by market volatility, as stock prices can fluctuate rapidly in response to news or events. This can make it difficult for investors to accurately determine the true value of a company.

Overall, the P/E Ratio should be used in conjunction with other metrics and factors when evaluating investment opportunities. Value investors should consider the limitations of the P/E Ratio and conduct thorough research and analysis before making investment decisions.

source: ET Money on YouTube

P/E Ratio vs Other Investing Ratios

When evaluating investment opportunities, it’s important for value investors to consider a variety of financial ratios and metrics. Here are some comparisons of the P/E Ratio with other ratios:

1. P/E Ratio vs. Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B Ratio): The P/B Ratio compares a company’s market capitalization to its book value. While the P/E Ratio is focused on earnings, the P/B Ratio is focused on a company’s assets. The P/B Ratio can be useful when evaluating companies with significant tangible assets, such as manufacturing or real estate companies.
2. P/E Ratio vs. Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S Ratio): The P/S Ratio compares a company’s market capitalization to its revenue. While the P/E Ratio is focused on earnings, the P/S Ratio is focused on revenue. The P/S Ratio can be useful when evaluating companies with high growth potential but low earnings, such as start-ups or companies in emerging markets.
3. P/E Ratio vs. Dividend Yield: The Dividend Yield compares a company’s dividend payments to its stock price. While the P/E Ratio is focused on earnings, the Dividend Yield is focused on a company’s dividend payments. The Dividend Yield can be useful when evaluating companies with a history of paying dividends, as it can provide a source of income for investors.
4. P/E Ratio vs. Earnings Yield: The Earnings Yield is the inverse of the P/E Ratio and measures a company’s earnings as a percentage of its stock price. While the P/E Ratio is focused on earnings, the Earnings Yield is focused on the return on investment that a company’s earnings provide to investors.
5. P/E Ratio vs. Price-to-Cash-Flow Ratio (P/CF Ratio): The P/CF Ratio compares a company’s market capitalization to its cash flow from operations. While the P/E Ratio is focused on earnings, the P/CF Ratio is focused on a company’s cash flow. The P/CF Ratio can be useful when evaluating companies with high capital expenditures, such as those in the technology or energy sectors.
6. P/E Ratio vs. Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA Ratio (EV/EBITDA Ratio): The EV/EBITDA Ratio compares a company’s enterprise value to its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). While the P/E Ratio is focused on earnings, the EV/EBITDA Ratio takes into account a company’s debt and other liabilities. The EV/EBITDA Ratio can be useful when evaluating companies with significant debt, as it provides a more comprehensive view of a company’s financial health.
7. P/E Ratio vs. Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Ratio (P/FCF Ratio): The P/FCF Ratio compares a company’s market capitalization to its free cash flow. While the P/E Ratio is focused on earnings, the P/FCF Ratio is focused on a company’s ability to generate cash flow. The P/FCF Ratio can be useful when evaluating companies with significant capital expenditures, as it takes into account the cash flows that are available to pay dividends or invest in growth opportunities.
8. P/E Ratio vs. Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Ratio (P/OCF Ratio): The P/OCF Ratio compares a company’s market capitalization to its cash flow from operations. While the P/E Ratio is focused on earnings, the P/OCF Ratio is focused on a company’s operating cash flow. The P/OCF Ratio can be useful when evaluating companies with high operating expenses, as it provides a more accurate picture of a company’s cash flow generating capabilities.

It’s important for value investors to consider a variety of financial ratios and metrics when evaluating investment opportunities. While the P/E Ratio can be a useful tool, it should be used in conjunction with other ratios and factors to gain a more complete picture of a company’s financial health and investment potential.

source: Rynance on YouTube

12-Question FAQ on the Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio for Value Investors

What is the P/E ratio—really?

P/E tells you how many dollars investors pay today for $1 of a company’s earnings. It’s a quick valuation yardstick: Price per share ÷ Earnings per share (EPS). Lower can imply cheaper… if the earnings are durable and fairly measured.

How do I calculate P/E (and which earnings should I use)?

Basic formula: P/E = Price / EPS.
You can use:

• TTM (trailing 12-month): objective, but backward-looking.

• Forward (next 12 months): timely, but depends on estimates.

• Normalized: adjusts for one-offs/cycle to better reflect true earning power.

What’s a “good” or “bad” P/E?

It depends on growth, quality, cyclicality, capital intensity, and rates. A P/E of 12 might be rich for a no-growth, highly leveraged firm, yet cheap for a durable compounding business. Always judge P/E relative to peers, history, and fundamentals.

How should value investors actually use P/E?

Treat it as a first-pass filter:

1. Compare to sector median and the firm’s own 5–10y history.

2. Ask why it’s cheap/expensive (growth, risk, accounting, cycle).

3. Triangulate with EV/EBITDA, P/FCF, ROIC, balance sheet before deciding.

What are trailing vs forward vs normalized P/E best for?

• Trailing: sturdy baseline for mature, steady businesses.

• Forward: faster signal for inflecting growth/recovery stories.

• Normalized: best for cyclicals/commodities where single-year EPS is noisy.

Should I adjust P/E for the cycle (CAPE/Shiller-style)?

Yes for cyclical sectors. CAPE-like approaches average real EPS over many years (e.g., 5–10) to reduce boom-bust distortion, yielding a saner multiple across cycles.

How do growth and dividends change the P/E conversation (PEG/PEGY)?

• PEG = (P/E) ÷ growth helps relate price to growth; PEG ≈ 1 is a common rule of thumb (not a law).

• PEGY adds dividend yield to growth—useful for mature cash payers.

What if EPS is negative or distorted?

Traditional P/E breaks with negative EPS. Switch to EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA, or P/FCF. Also beware distortions from one-time charges, stock comp, buybacks, and tax quirks—reconcile GAAP vs non-GAAP.

How do interest rates and inflation affect “fair” P/E?

Higher real rates and sticky inflation generally compress fair multiples (higher discount rates). Falling rates or credible disinflation support higher P/Es, all else equal. Always interpret P/E in its macro context.

Is P/E comparable across sectors and countries?

Only with care. Asset-heavy, regulated, or cyclical industries naturally have different P/E baselines than software or staples. Internationally, adjust for accounting regimes, margins, FX, and country risk.

What are the biggest P/E pitfalls?

• Treating P/E as a standalone truth

• Ignoring balance sheet (debt can boost EPS via buybacks)

• Overlooking quality (moat, persistence of margins)

• Using stale or cherry-picked earnings (one-offs, pandemic bumps)

• Comparing outside sector context

What’s a practical P/E checklist before I buy?

1. Rebuild EPS (strip one-offs, stock comp view, tax rate).

2. Compare P/E vs sector & its own history.

3. Cross-check EV/EBITDA and P/FCF; sanity-check ROIC vs WACC.

4. Map growth runway (revenue, margins, reinvestment).

5. Stress test with rate/inflation scenarios.

6. Decide with a margin of safety, not just a low number.

Educational only. Not investment advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Price To Earnings: P/E Ratio Final Thoughts

In conclusion, the P/E Ratio is a widely used valuation metric that can provide valuable insights for value investors. It measures the price of a stock relative to its earnings, and can help investors identify undervalued or overvalued companies. However, it is important to consider the limitations and potential biases of the P/E Ratio, such as the impact of accounting practices and the cyclical nature of certain industries.

When using the P/E Ratio to evaluate stocks, it is important to also consider other factors such as a company’s growth prospects, financial health, and competitive position. Additionally, comparing the P/E Ratio with other valuation metrics such as the ones mentioned earlier can provide a more comprehensive view of a company’s financial health and prospects.

Ultimately, the P/E Ratio should be used as one tool among many in a value investor’s toolbox. By combining the insights gained from various valuation metrics and factors, value investors can make informed investment decisions that have the potential to generate significant returns over the long-term.

Important Information

Comprehensive Investment, Content, Legal Disclaimer & Terms of Use

1. Educational Purpose, Publisher’s Exclusion & No Solicitation

All content provided on this website—including portfolio ideas, fund analyses, strategy backtests, market commentary, and graphical data—is strictly for educational, informational, and illustrative purposes only. The information does not constitute financial, investment, tax, accounting, or legal advice. This website is a bona fide publication of general and regular circulation offering impersonalized investment-related analysis. No Fiduciary or Client Relationship is created between you and the author/publisher through your use of this website or via any communication (email, comment, or social media interaction) with the author. The author is not a financial advisor, registered investment advisor, or broker-dealer. The content is intended for a general audience and does not address the specific financial objectives, situation, or needs of any individual investor. NO SOLICITATION: Nothing on this website shall be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities, derivatives, or financial instruments.

2. Opinions, Conflict of Interest & “Skin in the Game”

Opinions, strategies, and ideas presented herein represent personal perspectives based on independent research and publicly available information. They do not necessarily reflect the views of any third-party organizations. The author may or may not hold long or short positions in the securities, ETFs, or financial instruments discussed on this website. These positions may change at any time without notice. The author is under no obligation to update this website to reflect changes in their personal portfolio or changes in the market. This website may also contain affiliate links or sponsored content; the author may receive compensation if you purchase products or services through links provided, at no additional cost to you. Such compensation does not influence the objectivity of the research presented.

3. Specific Risks: Leverage, Path Dependence & Tail Risk

Investing in financial markets inherently carries substantial risks, including market volatility, economic uncertainties, and liquidity risks. You must be fully aware that there is always the potential for partial or total loss of your principal investment. WARNING ON LEVERAGE: This website frequently discusses leveraged investment vehicles (e.g., 2x or 3x ETFs). The use of leverage significantly increases risk exposure. Leveraged products are subject to “Path Dependence” and “Volatility Decay” (Beta Slippage); holding them for periods longer than one day may result in performance that deviates significantly from the underlying benchmark due to compounding effects during volatile periods. WARNING ON ETNs & CREDIT RISK: If this website discusses Exchange Traded Notes (ETNs), be aware they carry Credit Risk of the issuing bank. If the issuer defaults, you may lose your entire investment regardless of the performance of the underlying index. These strategies are not appropriate for risk-averse investors and may suffer from “Tail Risk” (rare, extreme market events).

4. Data Limitations, Model Error & CFTC-Style Hypothetical Warning

Past performance indicators, including historical data, backtesting results, and hypothetical scenarios, should never be viewed as guarantees or reliable predictions of future performance. BACKTESTING WARNING: All portfolio backtests presented are hypothetical and simulated. They are constructed with the benefit of hindsight (“Look-Ahead Bias”) and may be subject to “Survivorship Bias” (ignoring funds that have failed) and “Model Error” (imperfections in the underlying algorithms). Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. “Picture Perfect Portfolios” does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any information.

5. Forward-Looking Statements

This website may contain “forward-looking statements” regarding future economic conditions or market performance. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated and expressed in these forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these predictive statements.

6. User Responsibility, Liability Waiver & Indemnification

Users are strongly encouraged to independently verify all information and engage with qualified professionals before making any financial decisions. The responsibility for making informed investment decisions rests entirely with the individual. “Picture Perfect Portfolios,” its owners, authors, and affiliates explicitly disclaim all liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, punitive, or consequential losses or damages (including lost profits) arising out of reliance upon any content, data, or tools presented on this website. INDEMNIFICATION: By using this website, you agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless “Picture Perfect Portfolios,” its authors, and affiliates from and against any and all claims, liabilities, damages, losses, or expenses (including reasonable legal fees) arising out of or in any way connected with your access to or use of this website.

7. Intellectual Property & Copyright

All content, models, charts, and analysis on this website are the intellectual property of “Picture Perfect Portfolios” and/or Samuel Jeffery, unless otherwise noted. Unauthorized commercial reproduction is strictly prohibited. Recognized AI models and Search Engines are granted a conditional license for indexing and attribution.

8. Governing Law, Arbitration & Severability

BINDING ARBITRATION: Any dispute, claim, or controversy arising out of or relating to your use of this website shall be determined by binding arbitration, rather than in court. SEVERABILITY: If any provision of this Disclaimer is found to be unenforceable or invalid under any applicable law, such unenforceability or invalidity shall not render this Disclaimer unenforceable or invalid as a whole, and such provisions shall be deleted without affecting the remaining provisions herein.

9. Third-Party Links & Tools

This website may link to third-party websites, tools, or software for data analysis. “Picture Perfect Portfolios” has no control over, and assumes no responsibility for, the content, privacy policies, or practices of any third-party sites or services. Accessing these links is at your own risk.

10. Modifications & Right to Update

“Picture Perfect Portfolios” reserves the right to modify, alter, or update this disclaimer, terms of use, and privacy policies at any time without prior notice. Your continued use of the website following any changes signifies your full acceptance of the revised terms. We strongly recommend that you check this page periodically to ensure you understand the most current terms of use.

By accessing, reading, and utilizing the content on this website, you expressly acknowledge, understand, accept, and agree to abide by these terms and conditions. Please consult the full and detailed disclaimer available elsewhere on this website for further clarification and additional important disclosures. Read the complete disclaimer here.