Connecting with savvy advisors on Twitter has been one of the great unexpected benefits of running Picture Perfect Portfolios.
I had fully anticipated just stalking my “investing heroes” and interacting with other amateur investors.
Today we’re fortunate to have Mark McGrath join us as part of the “How I Invest” series to discuss investing strategies and financial planning.
Mark’s a legend in many regards but I’m most impressed by his informative tweets on a variety of financial subjects/topics aside from just portfolio optimization.
https://x.com/MarkMcGrathCFP/status/1633513632574377984
I’m the first to admit I get sucked into the rabbit-hole of obsessing almost exclusively about my portfolio but there are a plethora of other subjects worth considering when it comes to effective wealth management.
https://x.com/MarkMcGrathCFP/status/1632789715966623744
Fortunately for us curious investors, Mark decided to hit the pause button on his rock star aspirations to help us all become more informed on a wide variety of financial planning matters.
Without further, ado let’s turn things over to Mark!

Meet Mark McGrath: From Rock Star Aspirations To Helping Canadian Physicians

I planned to be a famous rock star, but it didn’t pan out.
I went to university with the intention of becoming a dentist since my dad told me that would be a great idea.
One day a friend introduced me to the Canadian Securities Course, and I fell in love.
I quit university on the spot to study personal finance and investment management full-time, and here I am about 15 years later.
Over the past decade, I’ve worked primarily with Canadian physicians and business owners on financial planning, including tax, insurance, retirement, investment, and estate planning.
I’m a bit of a planning geek, so I also spend a lot of my free time reading and writing about it.
But when I need a break, I occasionally pick up my guitar and remind myself why my dream of being a rock star was destined to fail.

How I Invest with Mark McGrath: Factor Focused Portfolios

About the Author & Disclosure
Picture Perfect Portfolios is the quantitative research arm of Samuel Jeffery, co-founder of the Samuel & Audrey Media Network. With over 15 years of global business experience and two World Travel Awards (Europe’s Leading Marketing Campaign 2017 & 2018), Samuel brings a unique global macro perspective to asset allocation.
Note: This content is strictly for educational purposes and reflects personal opinions, not professional financial advice. All strategies discussed involve risk; please consult a qualified advisor before investing.

These asset allocation ideas and model portfolios presented herein are purely for entertainment purposes only. This is NOT investment advice. These models are hypothetical and are intended to provide general information about potential ways to organize a portfolio based on theoretical scenarios and assumptions. They do not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation/goals, risk tolerance and/or specific needs of any particular individual.
From Get Rich Quickly To Sensible Factor Focused Portfolios
Who were your greatest influences as an investor when you first started to get passionate about the subject?
How have your views evolved over the years to where you currently stand?
If you had to recommend a handful of resources (books, podcasts, white-papers, etc) to bring others up to speed with your investing worldview what would you recommend?
Like many, it started when I read The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham. I think I was around 25 then, and it was my first real foray into markets and investing.
When I was younger, I always looked to get rich quickly, and this book opened my eyes.
I lent my copy to a friend and never got it back.
When I first started as an advisor, I was trained by the institution I worked for to sell their products.
Of course, they told me their products were the best, and I believed them.
All my colleagues and superiors were using them too, so they must have been good right?
And I think a lot of advisors are trained the same way.
It wasn’t until around 2013 that I started researching portfolio management, eventually completing the Chartered Investment Manager designation in 2015.
That’s a Canadian thing – your US readers probably haven’t heard of it, but it’s sort of like a light version of the first level of the CFA program.
Around this time, I stumbled on the Canadian Couch Potato blog, written primarily by Dan Bortolotti.
My mind was blown.
Dan went through all the data on active management and compared it to index investing.
It sort of shook me, seeing that none of my peers were using index funds then.
I did a full about-face with my clients and went to 100% index funds then and there.
Then in 2018, a podcast called the Rational Reminder came out.
This taught me about the Fama/French five-factor model and factor investing in general.
Since then, I use portfolios tilted to small-cap, value, and quality stocks.
I also use some private asset funds in some cases, but the core of my client portfolios are based on the five-factor model.
The Rational Reminder is still the best podcast on investing and personal finance, in my opinion.
They reference a lot of academic papers on portfolio management from various sources, so I do my best to read through some of those when I can.
source: Mark McGrath on YouTube

The Portfolio Is Simply One Component Of Financial Planning
Aside from investing influences, what real life events have molded your overall views as an investor?
Was it something to do with the way you grew up?
Taking on too much risk (or not enough) early on in your journey/career as an investor?
Or just any other life event or personality trait/characteristic that you feel has uniquely shaped the way you currently view yourself as an investor.
Education.
Travel.
Work Experience.
Volunteering.
A major life event.
What has helped shape the type of investor you’ve become today?
My dad got me into it.
He was a successful small business owner, and he taught me to read stock quotes in the newspaper when I was like 12.
I remember they used to quote prices in fractions back then.
I was disqualified from an investing competition in elementary school because my dad and I picked some microcap stock while everyone else picked Disney, Coca-Cola, etc.
Our returns for the month were something like 400%, so the teacher just gave the prize to the second-place kid.
Looking back, we just got lucky.
But I still should have won.
Over the years, I’ve realized that the portfolio is simply one component of financial planning.
The greatest portfolio in the world doesn’t matter if you can’t stick with it and avoid behavioural mistakes.
So I try to design resilient portfolios that don’t need to be tinkered with and spend little time talking about markets and investments with my clients after their portfolio is initially set up.

Beware Of The Madness Of Crowds + Learn To Ignore Noise
Imagine you could have a three hour conversation with your younger self.
What would you tell the younger version of yourself in order to become a better investor?
I would tell myself not to chase returns, beware of the madness of crowds, have patience, and learn to ignore the noise.
While I don’t think an index fund portfolio is the optimal portfolio, for many people, it’s pretty close.
I would tell myself to buy the total global market for as cheap as possible, always keep buying, never look at it to check performance, and then do something fun with my life.
That simple wisdom would give people an incredible head start if they implemented it early in their lives.

Factor Focused Portfolios: Build A Total Market Portfolio
Let’s pop the hood of your portfolio.
What kind of goodies do we have inside to showcase?
Spill the beans.
How much do you got of this?
Why did you decide to add a bit of that?
If you’d like to go over every line-item you can or if would be easier to break your portfolio into categories or quadrants that’s another route worth considering.
When do you anticipate this portfolio performing at its best?
As I mentioned, I’m a big fan of factor portfolios.
I primarily use Dimensional Fund Advisors for this, but I am also exploring adding some other products.
DFA makes up 50-70% of my portfolios.
Here in Canada they have global portfolios of various risk levels, comprised of different mixes of global stocks, bonds, and real estate.
They are one-fund solutions for around 35 basis points.
Simple, cheap, rebalances, and gives me factor exposure.
I know their factor tilts aren’t huge, but I’m okay with that.
For most of my clients, the concept of indexing alone is a vast improvement from how they previously managed their money.
Explaining factor investing in simple terms is complex, and dealing with volatility and tracking error is a struggle.
So DFA is a great starting point.
I add private real estate, private loans, and private equity for the right client.
My goal here is to try and build a total market portfolio.
The market capitalization of non-public investable assets is in the trillions, and adding these assets to portfolios might add additional sources of risk and return.
I know these products suffer from what Cliff Assnes has coined “volatility laundering”.
But I’m straight with my clients about it.
I tell them, “look – I know this fund never seems to go down, but that’s an illusion.
It’s probably to your benefit since it will make it easier for you to sit through a bad market without panicking, but there’s no magic portfolio that only goes up”.
So overall, for a growth-oriented client with a high risk tolerance and risk capacity and a long time horizon, they might be around 55% DFA Global Equity, 15% global private equity, 15% North American real estate, and 15% North American mortgages and loans.
My next task is to find global real estate and loans that I can add to portfolios in a cost-effective way.
source: Mark McGrath on YouTube
![]()
With Factor Investing, You Need To Tolerate Tracking Error
What kind of investing skills (trading, asset allocation, investor psychology, etc) are necessary to become good at the style of investing you’re pursuing?
Is there a certain type of knowledge, experience and/or personality trait that gives one an advantage running this type of portfolio?
With factor investing, you need to tolerate tracking error.
You’re intentionally saying you want to be different from the market, so you must be okay when your performance differs from the market.
Sometimes you’re doing better, and sometimes worse.
But if you remember why you’re investing this way, it helps.
It’s a bit tougher to explain this to clients who are novices when it comes to investing, but education is a massive part of my service to clients.
I like to say, “once you realize that nobody can predict asset prices in the short term, investing gets much easier.”
The only reason I have any idea what my portfolio performance has been over the past couple of years is that I invest my money in the exact same manner that I invest my clients’ money.
So when I see their performance, I know mine is in the same ballpark.
But otherwise, I never check my portfolio since I don’t need it for 20+ years.
You must be comfortable with that and confident in your strategy to pull this off in the long run.

No Secret Sauce: Asset Allocation and Simple Risk Management
What would be a toned down version of your portfolio?
Something that’s a bit watered down.
Conversely, what would be a more aggressive version of your portfolio, if someone were willing to take on more risk for a potentially greater reward?
Simplicity is one of my core investing values.
For a more aggressive investor, we’re all equity and real estate.
For a more conservative investor, we’re more fixed-income.
I use the DFA Global portfolios to implement this – so instead of using their Global Equity fund, I’ll use their 60/40 fund, for example.
That’s it – no secret sauce, just asset allocation and simple risk management.
source: Mark McGrath on YouTube

The Ability To Cut Through The Noise
What do you feel is your greatest strength as an investor?
What is something that sets you apart from others?
Conversely, what is your greatest weakness?
Are you currently trying to address this weakness, prevent it from easily manifesting or simply doubling down on what it is that you’re great at?
I think my greatest strength is the ability to cut through the noise.
The number of clients I have bringing me YouTube videos from dividend investing or crypto marketers is at an all-time high.
I’m pretty good at going back to the research and data and forming an opinion from there.
I also don’t really care about being right about anything, except to the extent that I’m using the best strategies that are backed up by research.
If I learn something new, I have no problem saying I was wrong or there’s a better way.
I don’t take it personally, and investing isn’t my identity.
Better research comes out?
Fantastic, let’s use it.
Otherwise, I don’t get FOMO about missing returns in anything and don’t particularly care what the market does in the short term.
I didn’t get caught up in the hype around Bitcoin, Tesla, or ARKK for example.
As for weaknesses – many would say it’s my disdain for dividend-focused strategies since, apparently, that’s free money.
But in all honesty, it’s probably shiny object syndrome.
I have a rule that I never say no to a conversation, and that’s served me incredibly well over the years.
But it also means I’m an easy target for wholesalers, so I talk to dozens of different fund different companies about their strategies each year.
And I love helping people, so sometimes I feel compelled to use a product simply because the wholesaler was nice.
I don’t end up using them, but I usually feel bad about it.

Managing Other Areas Of Finance That Really Moves The Needle
What’s something that you believe as an investor that is not widely agreed upon by the investing community at large?
On the other hand, what is a commonly held investing belief that most in the industry would agree with that rubs you a bit differently?
It’s got to be dividends. I’m completely agnostic.
In fact, I’d prefer not to receive a dividend, all things held constant since I simply don’t want the income and the tax bill associated with it.
I talk to people all the time focused on their portfolio yield with no consideration for their annualized returns.
And they don’t see a problem with it because they don’t think these dividend stocks can ever disappear, so they’re only focused on the amount of income they produce.
The data and research disagree with them, but they usually hand-wave it away.
As for what the industry believes in that I don’t – stock picking.
I think too many advisors believe that the value they bring to their clients revolves solely around picking winners, and I think that’s purely based on luck.
If you spend all your time trying to pick stocks, you’re leaving little time for more important things like helping clients achieve their goals and managing other areas of their finances that really move the needle.

I Won’t Implement Anything I Don’t Understand And Can’t Explain To Clients
What’s a subject area in investing that you’re eager to learn more about?
And why?
If you knew more about that particular topic would it influence the way you’d construct your portfolio?
It would if there was compelling peer-reviewed research to back it up.
I’ve been learning more about trend and momentum, following folks like you and others mainly on Twitter.
Corey Hoffstein has some fascinating work that right now is beyond my comprehension, so I’d like to dig into that a little bit more.
I won’t implement anything I don’t understand and can’t explain to clients, so it takes me a while to come around to a new strategy.

Avoiding Lottery Tickets And Get Rich Quick Schemes
What would be the ultimate anti-Ryan Telford portfolio?
Something you’d never own unless you were duct-taped to a chair as a hostage?
What about this portfolio is repulsive to you?
Conversely, if you were forced to Steel Man it, what would potentially be appealing about the portfolio to others?
What is so alluring about it?
A third each in cryptocurrency, Tesla, and ARKK.
They are lottery tickets, and people love the idea of getting rich quickly from a huge payoff.
Oh, maybe I’d throw in some dividend stocks and covered call ETFs so I could do YouTube videos on how much income my portfolio generates.
https://x.com/MarkMcGrathCFP
Frequently Asked Questions About Mark McGrath’s Factor-Focused Investing Approach
Who is Mark McGrath and why is he relevant to Canadian investors?
Mark McGrath is a Canadian financial planner who works primarily with physicians and business owners. He’s well-known on Twitter/X for sharing clear, evidence-based insights on investing, taxes, retirement, and financial planning. His approach blends practical planning with academically supported portfolio construction, making him a trusted voice in the Canadian investing community.
What was Mark McGrath’s original career path before finance?
Mark initially pursued music with dreams of becoming a rock star. Later, he entered university to study dentistry but switched paths after discovering the Canadian Securities Course. He left university to study finance full-time, eventually becoming a Certified Financial Planner who focuses on helping Canadian physicians and entrepreneurs.
What investing philosophy does Mark McGrath follow today?
Mark uses factor-tilted portfolios based on the Fama/French five-factor model, emphasizing small-cap, value, and quality stocks. He complements this core with select private assets but keeps costs low, maintains diversification, and relies heavily on evidence-based approaches rather than speculation or stock picking.
Which resources most influenced Mark’s investing journey?
Key influences include The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham, the Canadian Couch Potato blog, and the Rational Reminder podcast. These shifted his perspective away from get-rich-quick schemes toward disciplined, factor-based, index-tilted investing.
How does Mark view the role of portfolios in overall financial planning?
He sees the portfolio as just one component of financial planning. Behavioural discipline, risk management, tax planning, and sticking with the strategy matter more than constantly tweaking investments. A solid plan that minimizes tinkering often leads to better long-term outcomes.
What does Mark’s factor-focused portfolio typically include?
His core allocations are through Dimensional Fund Advisors (DFA) global portfolios—usually 50–70% DFA Global Equity—combined with private equity, real estate, and mortgage/loan investments for diversification. The goal is to approximate a “total market portfolio,” including public and private assets.
How does Mark explain factor investing to clients unfamiliar with it?
He educates clients on how factor investing intentionally deviates from the market, resulting in tracking error. He emphasizes patience, evidence, and understanding why the strategy works over the long term, helping clients tolerate performance differences without panicking.
What skills are essential to succeed with factor-based portfolios?
Key skills include tolerating tracking error, having a long-term mindset, understanding asset allocation, and maintaining behavioural discipline. It’s also crucial to communicate clearly with clients and avoid reacting to short-term noise.
How does Mark adapt portfolios for different risk tolerances?
For aggressive investors, portfolios are fully invested in equities and real estate. For conservative investors, he uses more fixed income via DFA Global 60/40 portfolios. His approach focuses on simple asset allocation and disciplined risk management, not complex trading strategies.
What does Mark consider his greatest investing strength and weakness?
His strength is cutting through noise and sticking to evidence-based strategies without chasing fads. His weakness is “shiny object syndrome” — he enjoys learning about new products, which sometimes leads to unnecessary conversations with wholesalers, though he rarely changes his approach.
Which investing beliefs set Mark apart from mainstream views?
Mark is agnostic toward dividends and skeptical of stock picking. He believes focusing on dividend yield often distracts from total return and tax efficiency. He also challenges the idea that advisors should prove their worth through picking winners rather than comprehensive financial planning.
What’s one investing topic Mark wants to learn more about?
He’s interested in understanding trend-following and momentum strategies more deeply. Although intrigued by the research, he won’t implement these until he can fully explain and justify them to clients, emphasizing his disciplined and research-first approach.
Connect With Mark McGrath
I’m most active on Twitter, but my handle is the same across Twitter, LinkedIn, and Instagram – @MarkMcGrathCFP.
Twitter: @MarkMcGrathCFP
LinkedIn: @MarkMcGrathCFP
Instagram: @MarkMcGrathCFP
I post daily on Twitter, usually about financial planning for Canadian business owners and physicians.

Nomadic Samuel Final Thoughts
I want to personally thank Mark for taking the time to participate in the “How I Invest” series by contributing thoughtful answers to all of the questions!
If you’ve read this article and would like to be a part of the interview series feel free to reach out to nomadicsamuel at gmail dot com.
That’s all I’ve got!
Ciao for now!
Disclaimer: Mark McGrath is a Wealth Advisor with Wellington-Altus Private Wealth (WAPW). The information contained herein is provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as financial, legal, tax or investment advice. Please consult a financial advisor and tax professional with respect to your personal financial situation and objectives. WAPW is a member of the Canadian Investor Protection Fund and the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada.
Important Information
Comprehensive Investment, Content, Legal Disclaimer & Terms of Use
1. Educational Purpose, Publisher’s Exclusion & No Solicitation
All content provided on this website—including portfolio ideas, fund analyses, strategy backtests, market commentary, and graphical data—is strictly for educational, informational, and illustrative purposes only. The information does not constitute financial, investment, tax, accounting, or legal advice. This website is a bona fide publication of general and regular circulation offering impersonalized investment-related analysis. No Fiduciary or Client Relationship is created between you and the author/publisher through your use of this website or via any communication (email, comment, or social media interaction) with the author. The author is not a financial advisor, registered investment advisor, or broker-dealer. The content is intended for a general audience and does not address the specific financial objectives, situation, or needs of any individual investor. NO SOLICITATION: Nothing on this website shall be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities, derivatives, or financial instruments.
2. Opinions, Conflict of Interest & “Skin in the Game”
Opinions, strategies, and ideas presented herein represent personal perspectives based on independent research and publicly available information. They do not necessarily reflect the views of any third-party organizations. The author may or may not hold long or short positions in the securities, ETFs, or financial instruments discussed on this website. These positions may change at any time without notice. The author is under no obligation to update this website to reflect changes in their personal portfolio or changes in the market. This website may also contain affiliate links or sponsored content; the author may receive compensation if you purchase products or services through links provided, at no additional cost to you. Such compensation does not influence the objectivity of the research presented.
3. Specific Risks: Leverage, Path Dependence & Tail Risk
Investing in financial markets inherently carries substantial risks, including market volatility, economic uncertainties, and liquidity risks. You must be fully aware that there is always the potential for partial or total loss of your principal investment. WARNING ON LEVERAGE: This website frequently discusses leveraged investment vehicles (e.g., 2x or 3x ETFs). The use of leverage significantly increases risk exposure. Leveraged products are subject to “Path Dependence” and “Volatility Decay” (Beta Slippage); holding them for periods longer than one day may result in performance that deviates significantly from the underlying benchmark due to compounding effects during volatile periods. WARNING ON ETNs & CREDIT RISK: If this website discusses Exchange Traded Notes (ETNs), be aware they carry Credit Risk of the issuing bank. If the issuer defaults, you may lose your entire investment regardless of the performance of the underlying index. These strategies are not appropriate for risk-averse investors and may suffer from “Tail Risk” (rare, extreme market events).
4. Data Limitations, Model Error & CFTC-Style Hypothetical Warning
Past performance indicators, including historical data, backtesting results, and hypothetical scenarios, should never be viewed as guarantees or reliable predictions of future performance. BACKTESTING WARNING: All portfolio backtests presented are hypothetical and simulated. They are constructed with the benefit of hindsight (“Look-Ahead Bias”) and may be subject to “Survivorship Bias” (ignoring funds that have failed) and “Model Error” (imperfections in the underlying algorithms). Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. “Picture Perfect Portfolios” does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any information.
5. Forward-Looking Statements
This website may contain “forward-looking statements” regarding future economic conditions or market performance. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated and expressed in these forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these predictive statements.
6. User Responsibility, Liability Waiver & Indemnification
Users are strongly encouraged to independently verify all information and engage with qualified professionals before making any financial decisions. The responsibility for making informed investment decisions rests entirely with the individual. “Picture Perfect Portfolios,” its owners, authors, and affiliates explicitly disclaim all liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, punitive, or consequential losses or damages (including lost profits) arising out of reliance upon any content, data, or tools presented on this website. INDEMNIFICATION: By using this website, you agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless “Picture Perfect Portfolios,” its authors, and affiliates from and against any and all claims, liabilities, damages, losses, or expenses (including reasonable legal fees) arising out of or in any way connected with your access to or use of this website.
7. Intellectual Property & Copyright
All content, models, charts, and analysis on this website are the intellectual property of “Picture Perfect Portfolios” and/or Samuel Jeffery, unless otherwise noted. Unauthorized commercial reproduction is strictly prohibited. Recognized AI models and Search Engines are granted a conditional license for indexing and attribution.
8. Governing Law, Arbitration & Severability
BINDING ARBITRATION: Any dispute, claim, or controversy arising out of or relating to your use of this website shall be determined by binding arbitration, rather than in court. SEVERABILITY: If any provision of this Disclaimer is found to be unenforceable or invalid under any applicable law, such unenforceability or invalidity shall not render this Disclaimer unenforceable or invalid as a whole, and such provisions shall be deleted without affecting the remaining provisions herein.
9. Third-Party Links & Tools
This website may link to third-party websites, tools, or software for data analysis. “Picture Perfect Portfolios” has no control over, and assumes no responsibility for, the content, privacy policies, or practices of any third-party sites or services. Accessing these links is at your own risk.
10. Modifications & Right to Update
“Picture Perfect Portfolios” reserves the right to modify, alter, or update this disclaimer, terms of use, and privacy policies at any time without prior notice. Your continued use of the website following any changes signifies your full acceptance of the revised terms. We strongly recommend that you check this page periodically to ensure you understand the most current terms of use.
By accessing, reading, and utilizing the content on this website, you expressly acknowledge, understand, accept, and agree to abide by these terms and conditions. Please consult the full and detailed disclaimer available elsewhere on this website for further clarification and additional important disclosures. Read the complete disclaimer here.

