With Picture Perfect Portfolios set to celebrate its first birthday in April, I must admit I’m pleased with the diverse range of investment strategies and products that we’ve covered.
We’ve zeroed in on factor focused equities, market neutral, long-short equity, arbitrage and managed futures just to name a few.
However, there is one strategy in particular that we’ve yet to shine the spotlight on: buffer funds.
Also known as defined outcome ETFs.
Today we’re fortunate enough to be joined by Tim Urbanowicz, CFA, Head of Research & Investment Strategy, Innovator ETFs.
We’ll be unpacking everything under the sun related to this particular strategy as we continue our “Strategy Behind The Fund” series.
Without further ado, let’s turn things over to Tim!
Meet Tim Urbanowicz of Innovator ETFs
Ever since I was a kid, I had a fascination with financial markets.
Growing up, we never had a lot of extra money, but when we did, it was always put in the bank with the goal of keeping it safe.
The stock market was viewed as way too risky.
The first time someone explained the time value of money to me, my mind was blown and I was hooked.
Fast forward a few years, I went off to school at Wheaton College in Wheaton, IL.
One of my business classes my junior year, I was assigned to study a local business, and unbeknownst to me, Wheaton, IL was on its way to becoming a powerhouse in the ETF industry.
The business I was assigned to was PowerShares ETFs, which is now the 4th largest ETF franchise in the world under the Invesco umbrella.
As a college student, sitting in front of ETF legends Bruce Bond and John Southard – having them explain to me what the ETF was, all the advantages it had, and how they were disrupting the market – was an incredible experience and one I was so blessed to have.
Ever since then I knew I wanted to work in ETFs.
Right out of school, I spent a few years at JP Morgan, before I was able to land a spot at PowerShares.
At PowerShares, I spent some time in sales, before moving on to help build out the capital markets group, and then serving as the director of fixed income ETFs for Invesco.
As for getting over to Innovator, a very good friend of mine, Trevor Terrell, was and is leading the distribution efforts for the firm.
We had discussed the idea of going over for a while, and at the time I was serving as an investment strategist for Northern Trust.
There finally came a point where it made sense for both of us, and it has been a fun ride ever since to become part of such a fast-growing organization whose products advisors are very drawn to.
Reviewing The Strategy Behind PJAN ETF (U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF: January Series) with Tim Urbanowicz
Hey guys! Here is the part where I mention I’m a travel content creator! This “The Strategy Behind The Fund” interview is entirely for entertainment purposes only. There could be considerable errors in the data I gathered. This is not financial advice. Do your own due diligence and research. Consult with a financial advisor.
What’s The Strategy Of Buffer “Defined Outcome” ETFs?
For those who aren’t necessarily familiar with buffer “defined outcome ETFs” style of investing, let’s first define what it is and then explain this strategy in practice by giving some clear examples.
Buffer ETFs are tools that can help investors narrow the range of potential outcomes by providing a defined outcome.
The ETFs offer upside exposure of a reference asset, such as SPY, QQQ, IWM, EFA or EEM, up to a predetermined cap, with a known buffer against losses over the outcome period.
As an example, IJAN, the Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF offers upside exposure to EFA up to a 22.51% cap and also provides a 15% buffer against losses, over the 12-month outcome period spanning 2023.
Another example would be BALT, the Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF.
This strategy offers upside exposure to SPY up to a 2.64% cap, with a 20% buffer against losses over a 3-month outcome period.
Each quarter, BALT simply resets and investors have a new 20% buffer against SPY losses and a new upside cap for the coming 3-month outcome period.
Unique Features Of U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF (January Series) PJAN ETF
Let’s go over all the unique features your fund offers so investors can better understand it.
What key exposure does it offer?
Is it static or dynamic in nature?
Is it active or passive?
Is it leveraged or not?
Is it a rules-based strategy or does it involve some discretionary inputs?
How about its fee structure?
- PJAN, Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF offers upside exposure to SPY, up to a 18.84% cap, with a 15% Buffer against losses over the 12-month outcome period spanning 2023.
- In order to deliver the outcome to investors, the options portfolio is set on the beginning of the outcome period and remains static through the end of the outcome period.
- The ETFs are structured as active and there is no leverage in PJAN or any other fund that Innovator offers for that matter.
- PJAN’s fee is 0.79% and is accrued daily, which is no different than other ETFs in the marketplace.
source: Innovator ETFs on YouTube
What Sets U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF (January Series) PJAN ETF Apart From Other Alternative Funds?
How does your fund set itself apart from other defensive alternative funds being offered in what is already a crowded marketplace?
What makes it unique?
There is no guesswork like you have with other strategies that might be categorized as ‘alternative’.
PJAN has a defined outcome and we know that if SPY goes up X, we are going to capture Y.
If SPY goes down, we know the level of protection we have.
This is very different than anything else that was in the ETF market and the big reason, in my opinion, that flows, interest and assets in Defined Outcome ETFs are exploding.
Investors hate uncertainty and unfortunately with most alternative strategies, there is always some level of it in terms of how a given strategy will work vs. a backtest.
Advisors and investors are often disenchanted when theory meets actual market realities.
PJAN removes that uncertainty.
When Will PJAN ETF (U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF: January Series) Perform At Its Best/Worst?
Let’s explore when your fund/strategy has performed at its best and worst historically or theoretically in backtests.
What types of market conditions or other scenarios are most favourable for this particular strategy?
On the other hand, when can investors expect this strategy to potentially struggle?
As I mentioned earlier, there is no guesswork with what Innovator Buffer ETFs deliver, and PJAN is no exception.
We know the upside we will capture, and we know the downside buffer we have in place.
PJAN is going to work the best relative to SPY when the equity market is selling off or when it is appreciating less than the cap.
The strategy will be less advantageous when the equity market rips above the cap. 2022 and 2020 provide a good example of each.
In 2022, SPY sold off over 19%, so investors realized the full 15% buffer, less the expense ratio over the outcome period, for a return of -5%.
In 2020, SPY finished up over 16% and at the time, PJAN had a cap of 8.5%. PJAN was capped out at 8.5%, less the expense ratio, for a total return of 7.7%.
PJAN ETF 2020 Cumulative Return
PJAN ETF 2022 Cumulative Return
Why Should Investors Consider U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF (January Series) PJAN ETF?
If we’re assuming that an industry standard portfolio for most investors is one aligned towards low cost beta exposure to global equities and bonds, why should investors consider your fund/strategy?
A few reasons.
One, Defined Outcome ETFs put investors in control of their risk and return profile, and allow them to target the exact exposure they want.
Investors have different needs, goals, and timelines and these strategies can really help them address all three with precision.
They are great tools for advisors helping clients plan, discussing expectations for their investment returns and matching their portfolios with their risk tolerance.
Secondly, with where the markets are right now, we think its very important for investors to look outside of the traditional asset allocation framework for risk management.
Higher inflation and higher interest rates remain the biggest threat to the market and continue to drive both equities and bonds higher and lower together.
Relying on traditional fixed income for risk management was a big mistake in 2022 and the backdrop for 2023 looks very similar.
Defined Outcome ETFs can really come in and add that risk management element investors need.
How Does PJAN ETF (U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF: January Series) Fit Into A Portfolio At Large?
Let’s examine how your fund/strategy integrates into a portfolio at large.
Is it meant to be a total portfolio solution, core holding or satellite diversifier?
What are some best case usage scenarios ranging from high to low conviction allocations?
Our strategies allow investors to dial down their risk as little or as much as they want.
Within research, I also have the opportunity to oversee our portfolio solutions team, which gives us a good view into how the financial advisor and institutional communities are using our Defined Outcome ETFs.
For PJAN, the applications have been wide-ranging.
We see a lot of teams using PJAN as a bond replacement or a bond complement, which has proven very advantageous recently.
Other groups use the fund as a way to complement equity exposure and dial down total portfolio risk.
Others use PJAN as a way to tactically implement their investment views.
These are just a few examples, there are many other applications as well.
The Cons of PJAN ETF: U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF (January Series)
What’s the biggest point of constructive criticism you’ve received about your fund since it has launched?
The biggest hang up early on was that you don’t get the dividend.
When we construct the portfolio, we use the market’s dividend to finance the buffer.
After last year’s sell off, however, and the 15% buffer that was delivered, I haven’t heard much criticism over missing the 1.6-1.7% dividend.
The Pros of PJAN ETF: U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF (January Series)
On the other hand, what have others praised about your fund?
Consistently delivering the outcome and experience that was expected. Innovator’s Defined Outcome ETF™ lineup has amassed 209 outcome period completions with the ETFs successfully resetting for the coming outcome period, and our first Buffer ETFs – BJUL, PJUL and UJUL are approaching their fifth rebalance.
The ETFs have done what they say they will do in terms of delivering a known buffer and exposure to market upside, and without capital gains distributions.
That track record has attracted more and more attention from investors.
Stay Tuned For Defined Outcome Income Strategies In The Near Future
We’ll finish things off with an open-ended question.
Is there anything that we haven’t covered yet that you’d like to mention about your fund/strategy?
We are really excited about a series of defined outcome income strategies that we should have coming to market in the near future.
These strategies will seek to deliver a known, high level of income, with a built-in barrier against losses over the outcome period.
This is something our client base has been asking for, and we are excited to deliver.
Connect With Tim Urbanowicz And Innovator ETFs
Connect with Tim on LinkedIn.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/tim-urbanowicz/
Subscribe to “The Defining View”- Investment commentary to help investors gain perspective, stay informed, and remain in control.
Connect with Innovator ETFs
Nomadic Samuel Final Thoughts
I want to personally thank Tim for taking the time to participate in the “Strategy Behind The Fund” series by contributing thoughtful answers to all of the questions!
If you’ve read this article and would like to have your fund featured, feel free to reach out to nomadicsamuel at gmail dot com.
That’s all I’ve got!
Ciao for now!
Important Information
Investment Disclaimer: The content provided here is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, tax or professional advice. Investments carry risks and are not guaranteed; errors in data may occur. Past performance, including backtest results, does not guarantee future outcomes. Please note that indexes are benchmarks and not directly investable. All examples are purely hypothetical. Do your own due diligence. You should conduct your own research and consult a professional advisor before making investment decisions.
“Picture Perfect Portfolios” does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information in this post and is not responsible for any financial losses or damages incurred from relying on this information. Investing involves the risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. When it comes to capital efficiency, using leverage (or leveraged products) in investing amplifies both potential gains and losses, making it possible to lose more than your initial investment. It involves higher risk and costs, including possible margin calls and interest expenses, which can adversely affect your financial condition. The views and opinions expressed in this post are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of anyone else. You can read my complete disclaimer here.
